Pentium M 770 vs Pentium M 780

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Pentium M 770 vs Pentium M 780 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Pentium M 770 vs Pentium M 780: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Pentium M 770

2005

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (545 vs 575).

Pentium M 780

2005

Why buy it

✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Quick Answers

So, is Pentium M 780 better than Pentium M 770?

Yes. Pentium M 780 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you 5.5% better PassMark and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Pentium M 780 has the edge because it leads the single-thread side of this matchup with 200% higher max boost clock.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Pentium M 780 is the stronger fit. You are getting 5.5% better PassMark, backed by 1 cores and 1 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Pentium M 780 still makes the most sense overall. Pentium M 780 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 5.5% higher PassMark.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Pentium M 780 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting more multi-core headroom with 1 cores / 1 threads instead of 1/1. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Pentium M 770 vs Pentium M 780 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Pentium M 770

The Pentium M 770 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Dothan (2004−2005) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Base frequency is 2.13 GHz, with boost up to 0.01 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 90 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 27 Watt. Memory support: DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 545 points. Launch price was $69.

Pentium M 780

The Pentium M 780 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Dothan (2004−2005) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Base frequency is 2.26 GHz, with boost up to 0.03 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 90 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 27 Watt. Memory support: DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 575 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Pentium M 770 and Pentium M 780 share an identical 1-core/1-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 0.01 GHz on the Pentium M 770 versus 0.03 GHz on the Pentium M 780 — a 100% clock advantage for the Pentium M 780 (base: 2.13 GHz vs 2.26 GHz). Both are built on the Dothan (2004−2005) architecture using a 90 nm process. In PassMark, the Pentium M 770 scores 545 against the Pentium M 780's 575 — a 5.4% lead for the Pentium M 780. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

Feature	Pentium M 770	Pentium M 780
Cores / Threads	1 / 1	1 / 1
Boost Clock	0.01 GHz	0.03 GHz+200%
Base Clock	2.13 GHz	2.26 GHz+6%
L3 Cache	0 kB	0 kB
L2 Cache	2 MB	2 MB
Process	90 nm	90 nm
Architecture	Dothan (2004−2005)	Dothan (2004−2005)
PassMark	545	575+6%