Athlon II Neo K145 vs Pentium M 770

AMD

Athlon II Neo K145

1 Cores1 Thrd1 WWMax: 1.8 GHz2010
VS
Intel

Pentium M 770

1 Cores1 Thrd27 WWMax: 0.01 GHz2005

Athlon II Neo K145 vs Pentium M 770 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Athlon II Neo K145 vs Pentium M 770 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Athlon II Neo K145 vs Pentium M 770: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Athlon II Neo K145

2010

Why buy it

  • βœ…Draws 1W instead of 27W, a 26W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Launch MSRP is still $50 MSRP, while Pentium M 770 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Pentium M 770

2005

Why buy it

    Trade-offs

    • ❌Lower PassMark (545 vs 565).
    • ❌2600% higher power demand at 27W vs 1W.

    Quick Answers

    So, is Athlon II Neo K145 better than Pentium M 770?
    Yes. Athlon II Neo K145 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you 3.7% better PassMark and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
    Which one is better for gaming?
    If gaming is the priority, Athlon II Neo K145 has the edge because it leads the single-thread side of this matchup with 17900% higher max boost clock.
    Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
    For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Athlon II Neo K145 is the stronger fit. You are getting 3.7% better PassMark, backed by 1 cores and 1 threads.
    Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
    Athlon II Neo K145 is the better buy right now. Athlon II Neo K145 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $50 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 3.7% higher PassMark. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (11.3 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
    Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
    Athlon II Neo K145 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2010 vs 2005) and more multi-core headroom with 1 cores / 1 threads instead of 1/1. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

    Athlon II Neo K145 vs Pentium M 770 Technical Specifications

    Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

    AMD

    Athlon II Neo K145

    The Athlon II Neo K145 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Nile (2010) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1.8 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: S1. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 565 points. Launch price was $149.

    Intel

    Pentium M 770

    The Pentium M 770 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Dothan (2004βˆ’2005) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Base frequency is 2.13 GHz, with boost up to 0.01 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 90 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 27 Watt. Memory support: DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 545 points. Launch price was $69.

    ⚑

    Processing Power

    Both the Athlon II Neo K145 and Pentium M 770 share an identical 1-core/1-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.8 GHz on the Athlon II Neo K145 versus 0.01 GHz on the Pentium M 770 β€” a 197.8% clock advantage for the Athlon II Neo K145. The Athlon II Neo K145 uses the Nile (2010) architecture (45 nm), while the Pentium M 770 uses Dothan (2004βˆ’2005) (90 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon II Neo K145 scores 565 against the Pentium M 770's 545 β€” a 3.6% lead for the Athlon II Neo K145.

    FeatureAthlon II Neo K145Pentium M 770
    Cores / Threads
    1 / 1
    1 / 1
    Boost Clock
    1.8 GHz+17900%
    0.01 GHz
    Base Clock
    β€”
    2.13 GHz
    L3 Cache
    β€”
    0 kB
    L2 Cache
    1 MB
    2 MB+100%
    Process
    45 nm-50%
    90 nm
    Architecture
    Nile (2010)
    Dothan (2004βˆ’2005)
    PassMark
    565+4%
    545
    🧠

    Memory & Platform

    The Athlon II Neo K145 uses the S1 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Pentium M 770 uses PGA478 (PCIe 1.1) β€” making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

    FeatureAthlon II Neo K145Pentium M 770
    Socket
    S1
    PGA478
    PCIe Generation
    PCIe 2.0+82%
    PCIe 1.1
    Max RAM Speed
    DDR3-1066
    β€”
    Max RAM Capacity
    4 GB
    β€”
    RAM Channels
    2
    β€”
    ECC Support
    No
    β€”
    PCIe Lanes
    0
    β€”