Sempron 3800+ vs Xeon 3.06

Sempron 3800+ vs Xeon 3.06 Performance Spectrum

Sempron 3800+

1 / 1

528

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Xeon 3.06

1 / 1

535

+1.3%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Sempron 3800+ vs Xeon 3.06 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Sempron 3800+ vs Xeon 3.06: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Sempron 3800+

2006

Why buy it

✅Draws 62W instead of 97W, a 35W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (528 vs 535).

Xeon 3.06

2003

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌56.5% higher power demand at 97W vs 62W.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon 3.06 better than Sempron 3800+?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon 3.06 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Sempron 3800+ is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon 3.06 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 1.1% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon 3.06 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.3% better PassMark, backed by 1 cores and 1 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon 3.06 still makes the most sense overall. Xeon 3.06 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Sempron 3800+ makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2006 vs 2003). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Sempron 3800+ vs Xeon 3.06 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Sempron 3800+

The Sempron 3800+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Outubro 2006 (19 years ago). It is based on the Manila (2001−2006) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2.2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 256 kB. Built on 90 nm process technology. Socket: AM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 62 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 528 points. Launch price was $21.

Xeon 3.06

The Xeon 3.06 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Gallatin (2003−2004) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 3.07 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: PGA604. Thermal design power (TDP): 97 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 535 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Sempron 3800+ and Xeon 3.06 share an identical 1-core/1-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.2 GHz on the Sempron 3800+ versus 3.07 GHz on the Xeon 3.06 — a 33% clock advantage for the Xeon 3.06. The Sempron 3800+ uses the Manila (2001−2006) architecture (90 nm), while the Xeon 3.06 uses Gallatin (2003−2004) (130 nm). In PassMark, the Sempron 3800+ scores 528 against the Xeon 3.06's 535 — a 1.3% lead for the Xeon 3.06. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Sempron 3800+ vs 2 MB on the Xeon 3.06.

Feature	Sempron 3800+	Xeon 3.06
Cores / Threads	1 / 1	1 / 1
Boost Clock	2.2 GHz	3.07 GHz+40%
L3 Cache	0 kB	2 MB
L2 Cache	256 kB	512 kB+100%
Process	90 nm-31%	130 nm
Architecture	Manila (2001−2006)	Gallatin (2003−2004)
PassMark	528	535+1%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Sempron 3800+ uses the AM2 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Xeon 3.06 uses PGA604 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.