TITAN V vs Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB
TITAN V
Popular choices:
Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB is significantly newer (2023 vs 2017). The Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The TITAN V lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.1% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the TITAN V.
| Insight | TITAN V | Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.1%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.1%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Volta) | 🏆Elite Architecture (RDNA 2.0 / 7nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | ✨ FSR 3 / AFMF Support |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | 🎮 High Capacity (12 GB) |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (267mm) | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $423 versus $1,045 for the TITAN V, it costs 60% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 147.3% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | TITAN V | Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+147.3%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($1,045) | ✅More affordable ($423) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of TITAN V and Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB
TITAN V
The TITAN V is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 7 2017. It features the Volta architecture. The core clock ranges from 1200 MHz to 1455 MHz. It has 5120 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,077 points. Launch price was $2,999.
Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB
The Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 17 2023. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2321 MHz to 2581 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 40 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,096 points. Launch price was $334.
Graphics Performance
The TITAN V scores 20,077 and the Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB reaches 20,096 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The TITAN V is built on Volta while the Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB uses RDNA 2.0, both on 12 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 5,120 (TITAN V) vs 2,560 (Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB). Raw compute: 14.9 TFLOPS (TITAN V) vs 13.21 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB). Boost clocks: 1455 MHz vs 2581 MHz.
| Feature | TITAN V | Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 20,077 | 20,096 |
| Architecture | Volta | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 5120+100% | 2560 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 14.9 TFLOPS+13% | 13.21 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1455 MHz | 2581 MHz+77% |
| ROPs | 96+50% | 64 |
| TMUs | 320+100% | 160 |
| L1 Cache | 7.5 MB+1400% | 0.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 4.5 MB+50% | 3 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB is support for FSR 3 / AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The TITAN V lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | TITAN V | Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 3 (Native) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 / AFMF (Driver) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 12 GB of video memory. Memory bandwidth: 653 GB/s (TITAN V) vs 384 GB/s (Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB) — a 70.1% advantage for the TITAN V. Bus width: 3072-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 4.5 MB (TITAN V) vs 3 MB (Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB) — the TITAN V has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | TITAN V | Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Memory Type | HBM2 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 653 GB/s+70% | 384 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 3072-bit+1500% | 192-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4.5 MB+50% | 3 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (TITAN V) vs 12.2 (Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | TITAN V | Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.3+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 6.0 (TITAN V) vs VCN 4.0 (Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP9 vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (TITAN V) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB).
| Feature | TITAN V | Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 6.0 | VCN 4.0 |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP9 | VCN 4.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The TITAN V draws 250W versus the Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB's 250W — a 0% difference. The Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (TITAN V) vs 600W (Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB). Power connectors: 2x 8-pin vs 8-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 240mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | TITAN V | Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 250W | 250W |
| Recommended PSU | 600W | 600W |
| Power Connector | 2x 8-pin | 8-pin |
| Length | 267mm | 240mm |
| Height | 112mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 75°C-12% |
| Perf/Watt | 80.3 | 80.4 |
Value Analysis
The TITAN V launched at $2999 MSRP and currently averages $1045, while the Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB launched at $289 and now averages $423. The Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB costs 59.5% less ($622 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 19.2 (TITAN V) vs 47.5 (Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB) — the Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB offers 147.4% better value. The Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2017).
| Feature | TITAN V | Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2999 | $289-90% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $1045 | $423-60% |
| Performance per Dollar | 19.2 | 47.5+147% |
| Codename | GV100 | Navi 22 |
| Release | December 7 2017 | October 17 2023 |
| Ranking | #109 | #75 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on TITAN V and Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB
