TITAN V vs GeForce RTX 4060
TITAN V
Popular choices:
GeForce RTX 4060
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 4060
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The GeForce RTX 4060 is significantly newer (2023 vs 2017). The GeForce RTX 4060 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The TITAN V lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The TITAN V is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.7% higher G3D Mark score and 50% more VRAM (12 GB vs 8 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce RTX 4060.
| Insight | TITAN V | GeForce RTX 4060 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.7%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.7%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Volta) | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) / 5nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+50%) | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (267mm) | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce RTX 4060 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $299 versus $1,045 for the TITAN V, it costs 71% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 240.3% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | TITAN V | GeForce RTX 4060 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+240.3%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($1,045) | ✅More affordable ($299) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of TITAN V and GeForce RTX 4060
TITAN V
The TITAN V is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 7 2017. It features the Volta architecture. The core clock ranges from 1200 MHz to 1455 MHz. It has 5120 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,077 points. Launch price was $2,999.
GeForce RTX 4060
The GeForce RTX 4060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1830 MHz to 2460 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 115W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 24 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 19,548 points. Launch price was $299.
Graphics Performance
The TITAN V scores 20,077 and the GeForce RTX 4060 reaches 19,548 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The TITAN V is built on Volta while the GeForce RTX 4060 uses Ada Lovelace, both on 12 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 5,120 (TITAN V) vs 3,072 (GeForce RTX 4060). Raw compute: 14.9 TFLOPS (TITAN V) vs 15.11 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060). Boost clocks: 1455 MHz vs 2460 MHz.
| Feature | TITAN V | GeForce RTX 4060 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 20,077+3% | 19,548 |
| Architecture | Volta | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 5120+67% | 3072 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 14.9 TFLOPS | 15.11 TFLOPS+1% |
| Boost Clock | 1455 MHz | 2460 MHz+69% |
| ROPs | 96+100% | 48 |
| TMUs | 320+233% | 96 |
| L1 Cache | 7.5 MB+150% | 3 MB |
| L2 Cache | 4.5 MB | 24 MB+433% |
| Tensor Cores | 640+567% | 96 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 is support for DLSS 3 Frame Gen. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The TITAN V lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | TITAN V | GeForce RTX 4060 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | DLSS 3.5 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | DLSS 3.0 (Native) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | Yes (DLSS 3.5) |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The TITAN V comes with 12 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 4060 has 8 GB. The TITAN V offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 653 GB/s (TITAN V) vs 272 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4060) — a 140.1% advantage for the TITAN V. Bus width: 3072-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 4.5 MB (TITAN V) vs 24 MB (GeForce RTX 4060) — the GeForce RTX 4060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | TITAN V | GeForce RTX 4060 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 12 GB+50% | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | HBM2 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 653 GB/s+140% | 272 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 3072-bit+2300% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4.5 MB | 24 MB+433% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (TITAN V) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4060). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | TITAN V | GeForce RTX 4060 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.3+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 6.0 (TITAN V) vs NVENC 8th gen (GeForce RTX 4060). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP9 vs NVDEC 5th gen. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (TITAN V) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4060).
| Feature | TITAN V | GeForce RTX 4060 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 6.0 | NVENC 8th gen |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP9 | NVDEC 5th gen |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The TITAN V draws 250W versus the GeForce RTX 4060's 115W — a 74% difference. The GeForce RTX 4060 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (TITAN V) vs 550W (GeForce RTX 4060). Power connectors: 2x 8-pin vs 8-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 240mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 73°C.
| Feature | TITAN V | GeForce RTX 4060 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 250W | 115W-54% |
| Recommended PSU | 600W | 550W-8% |
| Power Connector | 2x 8-pin | 8-pin |
| Length | 267mm | 240mm |
| Height | 112mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 73°C-14% |
| Perf/Watt | 80.3 | 170.0+112% |
Value Analysis
The TITAN V launched at $2999 MSRP and currently averages $1045, while the GeForce RTX 4060 launched at $299 and now averages $299. The GeForce RTX 4060 costs 71.4% less ($746 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 19.2 (TITAN V) vs 65.4 (GeForce RTX 4060) — the GeForce RTX 4060 offers 240.6% better value. The GeForce RTX 4060 is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2017).
| Feature | TITAN V | GeForce RTX 4060 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2999 | $299-90% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $1045 | $299-71% |
| Performance per Dollar | 19.2 | 65.4+241% |
| Codename | GV100 | AD107 |
| Release | December 7 2017 | May 18 2023 |
| Ranking | #109 | #84 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on TITAN V and GeForce RTX 4060
