TITAN V vs GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
TITAN V
Popular choices:
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is significantly newer (2023 vs 2017). The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The TITAN V lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 57.3% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the TITAN V.
| Insight | TITAN V | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-57.3%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+57.3%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Volta) | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) / 4nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | 🎮 High Capacity (12 GB) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (267mm) | Standard Size (285mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $590 versus $1,045 for the TITAN V, it costs 44% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 178.6% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | TITAN V | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+178.6%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($1,045) | ✅More affordable ($590) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of TITAN V and GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
TITAN V
The TITAN V is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 7 2017. It features the Volta architecture. The core clock ranges from 1200 MHz to 1455 MHz. It has 5120 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,077 points. Launch price was $2,999.
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2610 MHz. It has 7680 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 285W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 60 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 31,578 points. Launch price was $799.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the TITAN V scores 20,077 versus the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti's 31,578 — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti leads by 57.3%. The TITAN V is built on Volta while the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti uses Ada Lovelace, both on 12 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 5,120 (TITAN V) vs 7,680 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti). Raw compute: 14.9 TFLOPS (TITAN V) vs 40.09 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti). Boost clocks: 1455 MHz vs 2610 MHz.
| Feature | TITAN V | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 20,077 | 31,578+57% |
| Architecture | Volta | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 4 nm |
| Shading Units | 5120 | 7680+50% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 14.9 TFLOPS | 40.09 TFLOPS+169% |
| Boost Clock | 1455 MHz | 2610 MHz+79% |
| ROPs | 96+20% | 80 |
| TMUs | 320+33% | 240 |
| L1 Cache | 7.5 MB | 7.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 4.5 MB | 48 MB+967% |
| Tensor Cores | 640+167% | 240 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is support for DLSS 3 Frame Gen. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The TITAN V lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | TITAN V | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | DLSS 3.5 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | DLSS 3.0 (Native) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | Yes (DLSS 3.5) |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 12 GB of video memory. Memory bandwidth: 653 GB/s (TITAN V) vs 504 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) — a 29.6% advantage for the TITAN V. Bus width: 3072-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 4.5 MB (TITAN V) vs 48 MB (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | TITAN V | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Memory Type | HBM2 | GDDR6X |
| Memory Bandwidth | 653 GB/s+30% | 504 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 3072-bit+1500% | 192-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4.5 MB | 48 MB+967% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (TITAN V) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | TITAN V | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.3+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 6.0 (TITAN V) vs NVENC (8th Gen) (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP9 vs NVDEC (5th Gen). Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (TITAN V) vs AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti).
| Feature | TITAN V | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 6.0 | NVENC (8th Gen) |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP9 | NVDEC (5th Gen) |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 | AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The TITAN V draws 250W versus the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti's 285W — a 13.1% difference. The TITAN V is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (TITAN V) vs 700W (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti). Power connectors: 2x 8-pin vs 8-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 285mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 70°C.
| Feature | TITAN V | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 250W-12% | 285W |
| Recommended PSU | 600W-14% | 700W |
| Power Connector | 2x 8-pin | 8-pin |
| Length | 267mm | 285mm |
| Height | 112mm | 112mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 70°C-18% |
| Perf/Watt | 80.3 | 110.8+38% |
Value Analysis
The TITAN V launched at $2999 MSRP and currently averages $1045, while the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti launched at $799 and now averages $590. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti costs 43.5% less ($455 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 19.2 (TITAN V) vs 53.5 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti offers 178.6% better value. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2017).
| Feature | TITAN V | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2999 | $799-73% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $1045 | $590-44% |
| Performance per Dollar | 19.2 | 53.5+179% |
| Codename | GV100 | AD104 |
| Release | December 7 2017 | January 3 2023 |
| Ranking | #109 | #11 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on TITAN V and GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
