TITAN V vs Radeon PRO W6800
TITAN V
Popular choices:
Radeon PRO W6800
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar Radeon PRO W6800
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon PRO W6800 uses modern memory architecture. The Radeon PRO W6800 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The TITAN V lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon PRO W6800 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1% higher G3D Mark score and 166.7% more VRAM (32 GB vs 12 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the TITAN V.
| Insight | TITAN V | Radeon PRO W6800 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Volta) | 🔮Strong Longevity (RDNA 2.0 / 7nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | 🎮 High Capacity (32 GB) |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (267mm) | Standard Size (267mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The TITAN V offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $1,045 versus $2,249 for the Radeon PRO W6800, it costs 54% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 113.2% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | TITAN V | Radeon PRO W6800 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+113.2%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($1,045) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($2,249) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of TITAN V and Radeon PRO W6800
TITAN V
The TITAN V is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 7 2017. It features the Volta architecture. The core clock ranges from 1200 MHz to 1455 MHz. It has 5120 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,077 points. Launch price was $2,999.
Radeon PRO W6800
The Radeon PRO W6800 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 8 2021. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2075 MHz to 2320 MHz. It has 3840 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 60 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,270 points. Launch price was $2,249.
Graphics Performance
The TITAN V scores 20,077 and the Radeon PRO W6800 reaches 20,270 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The TITAN V is built on Volta while the Radeon PRO W6800 uses RDNA 2.0, both on 12 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 5,120 (TITAN V) vs 3,840 (Radeon PRO W6800). Raw compute: 14.9 TFLOPS (TITAN V) vs 17.82 TFLOPS (Radeon PRO W6800). Boost clocks: 1455 MHz vs 2320 MHz.
| Feature | TITAN V | Radeon PRO W6800 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 20,077 | 20,270 |
| Architecture | Volta | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 5120+33% | 3840 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 14.9 TFLOPS | 17.82 TFLOPS+20% |
| Boost Clock | 1455 MHz | 2320 MHz+59% |
| ROPs | 96 | 96 |
| TMUs | 320+33% | 240 |
| L1 Cache | 7.5 MB+900% | 0.75 MB |
| L2 Cache | 4.5 MB+13% | 4 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | TITAN V | Radeon PRO W6800 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The TITAN V comes with 12 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon PRO W6800 has 32 GB. The Radeon PRO W6800 offers 166.7% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 653 GB/s (TITAN V) vs 576 GB/s (Radeon PRO W6800) — a 13.4% advantage for the TITAN V. Bus width: 3072-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 4.5 MB (TITAN V) vs 4 MB (Radeon PRO W6800) — the TITAN V has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | TITAN V | Radeon PRO W6800 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 12 GB | 32 GB+167% |
| Memory Type | HBM2 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 653 GB/s+13% | 576 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 3072-bit+1100% | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4.5 MB+13% | 4 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (TITAN V) vs 12.2 (Radeon PRO W6800). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 6.
| Feature | TITAN V | Radeon PRO W6800 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 6+50% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 6.0 (TITAN V) vs VCN 3.0 (Radeon PRO W6800). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP9 vs VCN 3.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (TITAN V) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon PRO W6800).
| Feature | TITAN V | Radeon PRO W6800 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 6.0 | VCN 3.0 |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP9 | VCN 3.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The TITAN V draws 250W versus the Radeon PRO W6800's 250W — a 0% difference. The Radeon PRO W6800 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (TITAN V) vs 650W (Radeon PRO W6800). Power connectors: 2x 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | TITAN V | Radeon PRO W6800 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 250W | 250W |
| Recommended PSU | 600W-8% | 650W |
| Power Connector | 2x 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 267mm | 267mm |
| Height | 112mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 80°C-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 80.3 | 81.1 |
Value Analysis
The TITAN V launched at $2999 MSRP and currently averages $1045, while the Radeon PRO W6800 launched at $2249 and now averages $2249. The TITAN V costs 53.5% less ($1204 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 19.2 (TITAN V) vs 9.0 (Radeon PRO W6800) — the TITAN V offers 113.3% better value. The Radeon PRO W6800 is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2017).
| Feature | TITAN V | Radeon PRO W6800 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2999 | $2249-25% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $1045-54% | $2249 |
| Performance per Dollar | 19.2+113% | 9.0 |
| Codename | GV100 | Navi 21 |
| Release | December 7 2017 | June 8 2021 |
| Ranking | #109 | #74 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on TITAN V and Radeon PRO W6800
