CPU
GPU
TITAN V
Popular choices:
Radeon RX 6750 XT
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar Radeon RX 6750 XT
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon RX 6750 XT uses modern memory architecture. The Radeon RX 6750 XT likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The TITAN V lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon RX 6750 XT is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the TITAN V.
| Insight | TITAN V | Radeon RX 6750 XT |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-3%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+3%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Volta) | 🏆Elite Architecture (RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) / 7nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | ✨ FSR 3 / AFMF Support |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | 🎮 High Capacity (12 GB) |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (267mm) | Standard Size (267mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon RX 6750 XT offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $320 versus $1,045 for the TITAN V, it costs 69% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 236.5% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | TITAN V | Radeon RX 6750 XT |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+236.5%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($1,045) | ✅More affordable ($320) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of TITAN V and Radeon RX 6750 XT
TITAN V
The TITAN V is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 7 2017. It features the Volta architecture. The core clock ranges from 1200 MHz to 1455 MHz. It has 5120 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,077 points. Launch price was $2,999.
Radeon RX 6750 XT
The Radeon RX 6750 XT is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 3 2022. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2150 MHz to 2600 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 40 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,686 points. Launch price was $549.
Graphics Performance
The TITAN V scores 20,077 and the Radeon RX 6750 XT reaches 20,686 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The TITAN V is built on Volta while the Radeon RX 6750 XT uses RDNA 2.0, both on 12 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 5,120 (TITAN V) vs 2,560 (Radeon RX 6750 XT). Raw compute: 14.9 TFLOPS (TITAN V) vs 13.31 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 6750 XT). Boost clocks: 1455 MHz vs 2600 MHz.
| Feature | TITAN V | Radeon RX 6750 XT |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 20,077 | 20,686+3% |
| Architecture | Volta | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 5120+100% | 2560 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 14.9 TFLOPS+12% | 13.31 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1455 MHz | 2600 MHz+79% |
| ROPs | 96+50% | 64 |
| TMUs | 320+100% | 160 |
| L1 Cache | 7.5 MB+1400% | 0.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 4.5 MB+50% | 3 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 6750 XT is support for FSR 3 / AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The TITAN V lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | TITAN V | Radeon RX 6750 XT |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 3 (Native) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 / AFMF (Driver) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 12 GB of video memory. Memory bandwidth: 653 GB/s (TITAN V) vs 432 GB/s (Radeon RX 6750 XT) — a 51.2% advantage for the TITAN V. Bus width: 3072-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 4.5 MB (TITAN V) vs 3 MB (Radeon RX 6750 XT) — the TITAN V has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | TITAN V | Radeon RX 6750 XT |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Memory Type | HBM2 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 653 GB/s+51% | 432 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 3072-bit+1500% | 192-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4.5 MB+50% | 3 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (TITAN V) vs 12 Ultimate (Radeon RX 6750 XT). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | TITAN V | Radeon RX 6750 XT |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.3+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 6.0 (TITAN V) vs VCN 3.0 (Radeon RX 6750 XT). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP9 vs VCN 3.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (TITAN V) vs H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only),VP9 (Radeon RX 6750 XT).
| Feature | TITAN V | Radeon RX 6750 XT |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 6.0 | VCN 3.0 |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP9 | VCN 3.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 | H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only),VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The TITAN V draws 250W versus the Radeon RX 6750 XT's 250W — a 0% difference. The Radeon RX 6750 XT is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (TITAN V) vs 650W (Radeon RX 6750 XT). Power connectors: 2x 8-pin vs 6-pin + 8-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | TITAN V | Radeon RX 6750 XT |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 250W | 250W |
| Recommended PSU | 600W-8% | 650W |
| Power Connector | 2x 8-pin | 6-pin + 8-pin |
| Length | 267mm | 267mm |
| Height | 112mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 80°C-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 80.3 | 82.7+3% |
Value Analysis
The TITAN V launched at $2999 MSRP and currently averages $1045, while the Radeon RX 6750 XT launched at $549 and now averages $320. The Radeon RX 6750 XT costs 69.4% less ($725 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 19.2 (TITAN V) vs 64.6 (Radeon RX 6750 XT) — the Radeon RX 6750 XT offers 236.5% better value. The Radeon RX 6750 XT is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2017).
| Feature | TITAN V | Radeon RX 6750 XT |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2999 | $549-82% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $1045 | $320-69% |
| Performance per Dollar | 19.2 | 64.6+236% |
| Codename | GV100 | Navi 22 |
| Release | December 7 2017 | March 3 2022 |
| Ranking | #109 | #70 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on TITAN V and Radeon RX 6750 XT
