TITAN V vs RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation
TITAN V
Popular choices:
RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation is significantly newer (2023 vs 2017). The RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The TITAN V lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.9% higher G3D Mark score. However, the TITAN V offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | TITAN V | RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.9%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.9%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Volta) | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace / 5nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+500%) | 🎮 High Capacity (2 GB) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (267mm) | Standard Size (267mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The TITAN V offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $1,045 versus $1,450 for the RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation, it costs 28% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 34.8% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | TITAN V | RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+34.8%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($1,045) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($1,450) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of TITAN V and RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation
TITAN V
The TITAN V is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 7 2017. It features the Volta architecture. The core clock ranges from 1200 MHz to 1455 MHz. It has 5120 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,077 points. Launch price was $2,999.
RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation
The RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 21 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 720 MHz to 1560 MHz. It has 6144 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 48 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,669 points.
Graphics Performance
The TITAN V scores 20,077 and the RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation reaches 20,669 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The TITAN V is built on Volta while the RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation uses Ada Lovelace, both on 12 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 5,120 (TITAN V) vs 6,144 (RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation). Raw compute: 14.9 TFLOPS (TITAN V) vs 19.17 TFLOPS (RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation). Boost clocks: 1455 MHz vs 1560 MHz.
| Feature | TITAN V | RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 20,077 | 20,669+3% |
| Architecture | Volta | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 5120 | 6144+20% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 14.9 TFLOPS | 19.17 TFLOPS+29% |
| Boost Clock | 1455 MHz | 1560 MHz+7% |
| ROPs | 96+50% | 64 |
| TMUs | 320+67% | 192 |
| L1 Cache | 7.5 MB+25% | 6 MB |
| L2 Cache | 4.5 MB | 48 MB+967% |
| Tensor Cores | 640+233% | 192 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation is support for DLSS 3 Frame Gen. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The TITAN V lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | TITAN V | RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | DLSS 3.5 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | DLSS 3.0 (Native) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | Yes (DLSS 3.5) |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The TITAN V comes with 12 GB of VRAM, while the RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation has 2 GB. The TITAN V offers 500% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 653 GB/s (TITAN V) vs 280 GB/s (RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation) — a 133.2% advantage for the TITAN V. Bus width: 3072-bit vs 160-bit. L2 Cache: 4.5 MB (TITAN V) vs 48 MB (RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation) — the RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | TITAN V | RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 12 GB+500% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | HBM2 | GDDR6 ECC |
| Memory Bandwidth | 653 GB/s+133% | 280 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 3072-bit+1820% | 160-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4.5 MB | 48 MB+967% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (TITAN V) vs 12.2 (RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | TITAN V | RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.3+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 6.0 (TITAN V) vs 8th Gen NVENC (2x) (RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP9 vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (TITAN V) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation).
| Feature | TITAN V | RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 6.0 | 8th Gen NVENC (2x) |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP9 | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The TITAN V draws 250W versus the RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation's 70W — a 112.5% difference. The RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (TITAN V) vs 750W (RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation). Power connectors: 2x 8-pin vs 1x 8-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | TITAN V | RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 250W | 70W-72% |
| Recommended PSU | 600W-20% | 750W |
| Power Connector | 2x 8-pin | 1x 8-pin |
| Length | 267mm | 267mm |
| Height | 112mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 80°C-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 80.3 | 295.3+268% |
Value Analysis
The TITAN V launched at $2999 MSRP and currently averages $1045, while the RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation launched at $1999 and now averages $1450. The TITAN V costs 27.9% less ($405 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 19.2 (TITAN V) vs 14.3 (RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation) — the TITAN V offers 34.3% better value. The RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2017).
| Feature | TITAN V | RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2999 | $1999-33% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $1045-28% | $1450 |
| Performance per Dollar | 19.2+34% | 14.3 |
| Codename | GV100 | AD104 |
| Release | December 7 2017 | March 21 2023 |
| Ranking | #109 | #71 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on TITAN V and RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation
