Turion II Neo K625
Xeon 5140
Turion II Neo K625 vs Xeon 5140 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Turion II Neo K625 vs Xeon 5140 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Turion II Neo K625 vs Xeon 5140: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Turion II Neo K625
2010Why buy it
- ✅+0.5% higher PassMark.
- ✅Draws 1W instead of 65W, a 64W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Xeon 5140
2006Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (1,235 vs 1,241).
- ❌6400% higher power demand at 65W vs 1W.
Quick Answers
So, is Turion II Neo K625 better than Xeon 5140?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Turion II Neo K625 vs Xeon 5140 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
Turion II Neo K625
The Turion II Neo K625 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Geneva (2010) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.5 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: S1. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 1,241 points. Launch price was $69.
Xeon 5140
The Xeon 5140 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in Junho 2006 (19 years ago). It is based on the Woodcrest (2006) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.33 GHz, with boost up to 2.33 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: LGA771. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 1,235 points. Launch price was $15.
Processing Power
Both the Turion II Neo K625 and Xeon 5140 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.5 GHz on the Turion II Neo K625 versus 2.33 GHz on the Xeon 5140 — a 43.3% clock advantage for the Xeon 5140. The Turion II Neo K625 uses the Geneva (2010) architecture (45 nm), while the Xeon 5140 uses Woodcrest (2006) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Turion II Neo K625 scores 1,241 against the Xeon 5140's 1,235 — a 0.5% lead for the Turion II Neo K625.
| Feature | Turion II Neo K625 | Xeon 5140 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 1.5 GHz | 2.33 GHz+55% |
| Base Clock | — | 2.33 GHz |
| L3 Cache | — | 0 kB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 4 MB+300% |
| Process | 45 nm-31% | 65 nm |
| Architecture | Geneva (2010) | Woodcrest (2006) |
| PassMark | 1,241 | 1,235 |
Memory & Platform
The Turion II Neo K625 uses the S1 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Xeon 5140 uses LGA771 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Turion II Neo K625 | Xeon 5140 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | S1 | LGA771 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 2.0 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Turion II Neo K625 and Xeon 5140
