Turion II P560 vs Xeon E7320

Turion II P560 vs Xeon E7320 Performance Spectrum

Turion II P560

2 / 2

1,455

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Xeon E7320

1,469

+1.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Turion II P560 vs Xeon E7320 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Turion II P560 vs Xeon E7320: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Turion II P560

2010

Why buy it

✅Draws 2W instead of 80W, a 78W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E7320 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (1,455 vs 1,469).

Xeon E7320

2007

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +4.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

❌3900% higher power demand at 80W vs 2W.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon E7320 better than Turion II P560?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E7320 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Turion II P560 is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon E7320 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 4.0% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E7320 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1% better PassMark.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon E7320 still makes the most sense overall. Xeon E7320 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 4.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Turion II P560 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2010 vs 2007). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Turion II P560 vs Xeon E7320 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Turion II P560

The Turion II P560 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Champlain (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2.5 GHz. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: S1. Thermal design power (TDP): 2 MB. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,455 points. Launch price was $69.

Xeon E7320

The Xeon E7320 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. Base frequency: 2.13 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB L2 Cache. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: PGA604. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,469 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The Turion II P560 is built on the Champlain (2010−2011) architecture. In PassMark, the Turion II P560 scores 1,455 against the Xeon E7320's 1,469 — a 1% lead for the Xeon E7320.

Feature	Turion II P560	Xeon E7320
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	—
Boost Clock	2.5 GHz	—
Base Clock	—	2.13 GHz
L3 Cache	—	4 MB L2 Cache
L2 Cache	2 MB	—
Process	45 nm-31%	65 nm
Architecture	Champlain (2010−2011)	—
PassMark	1,455	1,469