Turion II P560 vs Xeon X5272

Turion II P560 vs Xeon X5272 Performance Spectrum

Turion II P560

2 / 2

1,455

+0.3%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Xeon X5272

1,451

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Turion II P560 vs Xeon X5272 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Turion II P560 vs Xeon X5272: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Turion II P560

2010

Why buy it

✅Draws 2W instead of 80W, a 78W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Xeon X5272

2007

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,451 vs 1,455).
❌Launch MSRP is still $1,172 MSRP, while Turion II P560 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌3900% higher power demand at 80W vs 2W.

Quick Answers

So, is Turion II P560 better than Xeon X5272?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon X5272 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Turion II P560 is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Turion II P560 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 1.3% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Turion II P560 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.3% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Turion II P560 is still the faster CPU overall, but Xeon X5272 is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Turion II P560 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $1,172 MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Xeon X5272 is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (1.2 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Turion II P560 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2010 vs 2007). That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Turion II P560 vs Xeon X5272 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Turion II P560

The Turion II P560 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Champlain (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2.5 GHz. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: S1. Thermal design power (TDP): 2 MB. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,455 points. Launch price was $69.

Xeon X5272

The Xeon X5272 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. Base frequency: 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB L2 Cache. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA771. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,451 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The Turion II P560 is built on the Champlain (2010−2011) architecture. In PassMark, the Turion II P560 scores 1,455 against the Xeon X5272's 1,451 — a 0.3% lead for the Turion II P560.

Feature	Turion II P560	Xeon X5272
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	—
Boost Clock	2.5 GHz	—
Base Clock	—	3.4 GHz
L3 Cache	—	6 MB L2 Cache
L2 Cache	2 MB	—
Process	45 nm	45 nm
Architecture	Champlain (2010−2011)	—
PassMark	1,455	1,451