Xeon D-2795NT
VS
Ryzen 7 7840HS

Xeon D-2795NT vs Ryzen 7 7840HS

Intel

Xeon D-2795NT

20 Cores40 Thrd110 WWMax: 3.1 GHz2022
VS
AMD

Ryzen 7 7840HS

8 Cores16 Thrd35 WWMax: 5.1 GHz2023

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon D-2795NT

#438
EPYC 9555
MSRP: $9826|Avg: $7973
106%
#439
Xeon Gold 6338
MSRP: $2990|Avg: $1604
105%
#440
Xeon Gold 6538N
MSRP: $3351|Avg: $170
105%
#441
EPYC 7F52
MSRP: $3100|Avg: $1826
104%
#442
EPYC 7542
MSRP: $3400|Avg: $899
104%
#443
EPYC 9655
MSRP: $11852|Avg: $11852
103%
#444
Xeon 6781P
MSRP: $8960|Avg: $8960
103%
#445
Xeon Gold 6338N
MSRP: $3200|Avg: $3200
103%
#446
Xeon Gold 5117
MSRP: $1286|Avg: $300
103%
#447
EPYC 73F3
MSRP: $3521|Avg: $2100
102%
#448
EPYC 9384X
MSRP: $5529|Avg: $4157
102%
#449
EPYC 8534P
MSRP: $5529|Avg: $5529
102%
#450
EPYC 7663
MSRP: $6366|Avg: $6366
101%
#450
EPYC 9565
MSRP: $10486|Avg: $8233
101%
#452
EPYC 9755
MSRP: $12984|Avg: $10931
100%
#453
Xeon D-2795NT
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#454
Xeon Platinum 8368
MSRP: $7214|Avg: $429
100%
#456
EPYC 9575F
MSRP: $11791|Avg: $9238
98%
#457
EPYC 7642
MSRP: $4775|Avg: $850
97%
#458
EPYC 7573X
MSRP: $5590|Avg: $3580
97%
#459
Xeon Platinum 8568Y+
MSRP: $6497|Avg: $6497
96%
#460
Xeon E5-2686 V3
MSRP: $1500|Avg: $160
95%
#460
Xeon Gold 6242R
MSRP: $2977|Avg: $779
95%
#462
Xeon W-2175
MSRP: $1947|Avg: $180
94%
#463
EPYC 75F3
MSRP: $5383|Avg: $2799
94%
#464
Xeon W-3375
MSRP: $4951|Avg: $6000
93%
#466
Xeon Platinum 8358
MSRP: $4607|Avg: $3145
92%
#467
EPYC 7713
MSRP: $7060|Avg: $1299
92%
#467
EPYC 7662
MSRP: $6150|Avg: $1266
92%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Ryzen 7 7840HS

#57
Ryzen AI 9 365
MSRP: $400|Avg: $400
106%
#64
Ryzen AI Max PRO 390
MSRP: $600|Avg: $600
101%
#66
Ryzen 7 7840HS
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#73
Core i9-13950HX
MSRP: $590|Avg: $199
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Use Case Distinction: This is a comparison between a Professional Workstation processor ($0) and a Consumer Desktop CPU. The Xeon D-2795NT is engineered for massive parallel workloads (rendering, scientific simulations), offering significantly higher core counts.
InsightXeon D-2795NTRyzen 7 7840HS
Gaming
Balanced gaming performance
Balanced gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing
Longevity
✨ Modern (Legacy / 10 nm)
✨ Modern (Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023) / 4 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Ryzen 7 7840HS ($0), however, is optimized for mixed workloads and gaming. For most users, it offers superior single-thread performance and responsiveness at a fraction of the cost ($0 less, NaN% cheaper), making it the better choice for daily use and gaming.
InsightXeon D-2795NTRyzen 7 7840HS
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Xeon D-2795NT and Ryzen 7 7840HS

Intel

Xeon D-2795NT

The Xeon D-2795NT is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It features 20 cores and 40 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB. Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2579. Thermal design power (TDP): 110 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 28,463 points. Launch price was $800.

AMD

Ryzen 7 7840HS

The Ryzen 7 7840HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Janeiro 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 28,538 points. Launch price was $299.

Processing Power

The Xeon D-2795NT packs 20 cores / 40 threads, while the Ryzen 7 7840HS offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Xeon D-2795NT has 12 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.1 GHz on the Xeon D-2795NT versus 5.1 GHz on the Ryzen 7 7840HS — a 48.8% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 7840HS (base: 2 GHz vs 3.8 GHz). The Ryzen 7 7840HS is built on the Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023) architecture. In PassMark, the Xeon D-2795NT scores 28,463 against the Ryzen 7 7840HS's 28,538 — a 0.3% lead for the Ryzen 7 7840HS. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 15,000 vs 16,854 (11.6% advantage for the Ryzen 7 7840HS). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,962 vs 1,962, a 0% lead for the Ryzen 7 7840HS that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 11,898 vs 11,898 (0% advantage for the Ryzen 7 7840HS). L3 cache: 30 MB on the Xeon D-2795NT vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 7840HS.

FeatureXeon D-2795NTRyzen 7 7840HS
Cores / Threads
20 / 40+150%
8 / 16
Boost Clock
3.1 GHz
5.1 GHz+65%
Base Clock
2 GHz
3.8 GHz+90%
L3 Cache
30 MB+88%
16 MB (total)
L2 Cache
1 MB (per core)
Process
10 nm
4 nm-60%
Architecture
Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023)
PassMark
28,463
28,538
Cinebench R23 Multi
15,000
16,854+12%
Geekbench 6 Single
1,962
1,962
Geekbench 6 Multi
11,898
11,898
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon D-2795NT uses the FCBGA2579 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 7 7840HS uses FP8 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2933 on the Xeon D-2795NT versus LPDDR5-7500 / DDR5-5600 on the Ryzen 7 7840HS — the Ryzen 7 7840HS supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon D-2795NT supports up to 1024 GB of RAM compared to 256 GB 120% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 4 (Xeon D-2795NT) vs 2 (Ryzen 7 7840HS). PCIe lanes: 32 (Xeon D-2795NT) vs 20 (Ryzen 7 7840HS) — the Xeon D-2795NT offers 12 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SoC platform (Xeon D-2795NT) and FP7,FP7r2,FP8 (Ryzen 7 7840HS).

FeatureXeon D-2795NTRyzen 7 7840HS
Socket
FCBGA2579
FP8
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0
PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2933
LPDDR5-7500 / DDR5-5600+25%
Max RAM Capacity
1024 GB+300%
256 GB
RAM Channels
4+100%
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
32+60%
20
🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Ryzen 7 7840HS has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Xeon D-2795NT) vs AMD-V, SVM (Ryzen 7 7840HS). The Ryzen 7 7840HS includes integrated graphics (Radeon 780M), while the Xeon D-2795NT requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Xeon D-2795NT targets Networking / Edge Computing / SoC, Ryzen 7 7840HS targets High-performance Laptop / Mini-PC. Direct competitor: Xeon D-2795NT rivals EPYC 7302; Ryzen 7 7840HS rivals Core i7-13700H.

FeatureXeon D-2795NTRyzen 7 7840HS
Integrated GPU
No
Yes
IGPU Model
Radeon 780M
Unlocked
No
Yes
AVX-512
Yes
Yes
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
AMD-V, SVM
Target Use
Networking / Edge Computing / SoC
High-performance Laptop / Mini-PC