Xeon E5-2403 v2 vs Xeon E5607

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Xeon E5-2403 v2 vs Xeon E5607 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Xeon E5-2403 v2 vs Xeon E5607: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Xeon E5-2403 v2

2013

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +6.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+25% larger total L3 cache (10 MB vs 8 MB).
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (2,672 vs 2,686).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 13.9 vs 19.9 PassMark/$ ($192 MSRP vs $135 MSRP).

Xeon E5607

2011

Why buy it

✅+0.5% higher PassMark.
✅Costs $57 less on MSRP ($135 MSRP vs $192 MSRP).
✅Delivers 43.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 19.9 vs 13.9 PassMark/$ ($135 MSRP vs $192 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E5-2403 v2 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 10 MB).

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon E5607 better than Xeon E5-2403 v2?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Xeon E5-2403 v2 is ahead with a 6.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E5607 pulls ahead with 0.5% better PassMark. Xeon E5-2403 v2 also has the bigger cache pool with 25% larger total L3 cache (10 MB vs 8 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E5607 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.5% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon E5607 is the better buy right now. Xeon E5607 comes in $57 cheaper on MSRP at $135 MSRP versus $192 MSRP, and it still gives you 0.5% better PassMark. The compromise is that Xeon E5-2403 v2 is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 6.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 43.0% better value on MSRP (19.9 vs 13.9 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon E5-2403 v2 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2011) and 25% larger total L3 cache (10 MB vs 8 MB). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Xeon E5-2403 v2 vs Xeon E5607 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Xeon E5-2403 v2

The Xeon E5-2403 v2 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge-EN (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 1.8 GHz. L3 cache: 10 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1356. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,672 points. Launch price was $223.

Xeon E5607

The Xeon E5607 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 February 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Westmere-EP (2010−2011) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.26 GHz, with boost up to 0.27 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1366. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,686 points. Launch price was $135.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Xeon E5-2403 v2 and Xeon E5607 share an identical 4-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.8 GHz on the Xeon E5-2403 v2 versus 0.27 GHz on the Xeon E5607 — a 147.8% clock advantage for the Xeon E5-2403 v2 (base: 1.8 GHz vs 2.26 GHz). The Xeon E5-2403 v2 uses the Ivy Bridge-EN (2013−2014) architecture (22 nm), while the Xeon E5607 uses Westmere-EP (2010−2011) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon E5-2403 v2 scores 2,672 against the Xeon E5607's 2,686 — a 0.5% lead for the Xeon E5607. L3 cache: 10 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-2403 v2 vs 8 MB (total) on the Xeon E5607.

Feature	Xeon E5-2403 v2	Xeon E5607
Cores / Threads	4 / 4	4 / 4
Boost Clock	1.8 GHz+567%	0.27 GHz
Base Clock	1.8 GHz	2.26 GHz+26%
L3 Cache	10 MB (total)+25%	8 MB (total)
L2 Cache	256 kB (per core)	256 kB (per core)
Process	22 nm-31%	32 nm
Architecture	Ivy Bridge-EN (2013−2014)	Westmere-EP (2010−2011)
PassMark	2,672	2,686

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon E5-2403 v2 uses the LGA1356 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E5607 uses LGA1366 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Xeon E5-2403 v2	Xeon E5607
Socket	LGA1356	LGA1366
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1333	—
Max RAM Capacity	384 GB	—
RAM Channels	3	—
ECC Support	Yes	—
PCIe Lanes	24	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Xeon E5-2403 v2) / not specified (Xeon E5607). Primary use case: Xeon E5-2403 v2 targets Server.

Feature	Xeon E5-2403 v2	Xeon E5607
Integrated GPU	No	—
Unlocked	No	—
AVX-512	No	—
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	—
Target Use	Server	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Xeon E5-2403 v2 was priced at $192, while the Xeon E5607 came in at $135. On launch pricing ($192 vs $135), Xeon E5607 was $57 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon E5-2403 v2 delivers 13.9 pts/$ vs 19.9 pts/$ for the Xeon E5607 — making the Xeon E5607 the 35.4% better value option.

Feature	Xeon E5-2403 v2	Xeon E5607
MSRP	$192	$135-30%
Performance per Dollar	13.9	19.9+43%
Release Date	2013	2011

Search Xeon E5-2403 v2 on Amazon

Search Xeon E5607 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.