Celeron J4115 vs Xeon E5-2403 v2

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron J4115 vs Xeon E5-2403 v2 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron J4115 vs Xeon E5-2403 v2: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron J4115

2019

Why buy it

✅+0.6% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 4W instead of 80W, a 76W reduction.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel UHD Graphics 600, while Xeon E5-2403 v2 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E5-2403 v2 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 10 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2403 v2, which brings 4 cores / 4 threads and 24 PCIe lanes.

Xeon E5-2403 v2

2013

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +4.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+150% larger total L3 cache (10 MB vs 4 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 4 cores / 4 threads, plus 24 PCIe lanes vs 6.
✅300% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 6) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (2,672 vs 2,688).
❌Launch MSRP is still $192 MSRP, while Celeron J4115 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌1900% higher power demand at 80W vs 4W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron J4115 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron J4115 better than Xeon E5-2403 v2?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E5-2403 v2 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Celeron J4115 is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron J4115 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.6% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron J4115 is still the faster CPU overall, but Xeon E5-2403 v2 is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Celeron J4115 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $192 MSRP, and it still gives you 0.6% better PassMark. The compromise is that Xeon E5-2403 v2 is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 4.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Xeon E5-2403 v2 is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (13.9 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron J4115 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2019 vs 2013) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 4 threads instead of 4/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Celeron J4115 vs Xeon E5-2403 v2 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron J4115

The Celeron J4115 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Gemini Lake (2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.5 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1090. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 2,688 points. Launch price was $69.

Xeon E5-2403 v2

The Xeon E5-2403 v2 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge-EN (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 1.8 GHz. L3 cache: 10 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1356. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,672 points. Launch price was $223.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Celeron J4115 and Xeon E5-2403 v2 share an identical 4-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.5 GHz on the Celeron J4115 versus 1.8 GHz on the Xeon E5-2403 v2 — a 32.6% clock advantage for the Celeron J4115 (base: 1.8 GHz vs 1.8 GHz). The Celeron J4115 uses the Gemini Lake (2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon E5-2403 v2 uses Ivy Bridge-EN (2013−2014) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron J4115 scores 2,688 against the Xeon E5-2403 v2's 2,672 — a 0.6% lead for the Celeron J4115. L3 cache: 4 MB on the Celeron J4115 vs 10 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-2403 v2.

Feature	Celeron J4115	Xeon E5-2403 v2
Cores / Threads	4 / 4	4 / 4
Boost Clock	2.5 GHz+39%	1.8 GHz
Base Clock	1.8 GHz	1.8 GHz
L3 Cache	4 MB	10 MB (total)+150%
L2 Cache	4 MB+1500%	256 kB (per core)
Process	14 nm-36%	22 nm
Architecture	Gemini Lake (2019)	Ivy Bridge-EN (2013−2014)
PassMark	2,688	2,672

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron J4115 uses the FCBGA1090 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E5-2403 v2 uses LGA1356 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 2400 on the Celeron J4115 versus DDR3-1333 on the Xeon E5-2403 v2 — the Celeron J4115 supports 80% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon E5-2403 v2 supports up to 384 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB — 4700% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Celeron J4115) vs 3 (Xeon E5-2403 v2). PCIe lanes: 6 (Celeron J4115) vs 24 (Xeon E5-2403 v2) — the Xeon E5-2403 v2 offers 18 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.

Feature	Celeron J4115	Xeon E5-2403 v2
Socket	FCBGA1090	LGA1356
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	2400+80%	DDR3-1333
Max RAM Capacity	8 GB	384 GB+4700%
RAM Channels	2	3+50%
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	6	24+300%

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: true (Celeron J4115) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon E5-2403 v2). The Celeron J4115 includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics 600), while the Xeon E5-2403 v2 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Xeon E5-2403 v2 targets Server. Direct competitor: Celeron J4115 rivals Ryzen Embedded R1305G.