Xeon E5-2620 v3 vs Xeon X7350

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Xeon E5-2620 v3 vs Xeon X7350 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Xeon E5-2620 v3 vs Xeon X7350: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Xeon E5-2620 v3

2014

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +27.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+87.5% larger total L3 cache (15 MB vs 8 MB).
✅Draws 85W instead of 130W, a 45W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (40 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (7,734 vs 7,836).
❌Launch MSRP is still $417 MSRP, while Xeon X7350 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Xeon X7350

2007

Why buy it

✅+1.3% higher PassMark.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E5-2620 v3 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 15 MB).
❌52.9% higher power demand at 130W vs 85W.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon E5-2620 v3 better than Xeon X7350?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Xeon E5-2620 v3 is ahead with a 27.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Xeon X7350 pulls ahead with 1.3% better PassMark. Xeon E5-2620 v3 also has the bigger cache pool with 87.5% larger total L3 cache (15 MB vs 8 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon X7350 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.3% better PassMark, backed by 6 cores and 6 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon E5-2620 v3 is the better buy right now. Xeon E5-2620 v3 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $417 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 27.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Xeon X7350 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 1.3% better PassMark. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (18.5 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon E5-2620 v3 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2014 vs 2007), 87.5% larger total L3 cache (15 MB vs 8 MB), and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Xeon E5-2620 v3 vs Xeon X7350 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Xeon E5-2620 v3

The Xeon E5-2620 v3 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Haswell-EP (2014−2015) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 15 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 85 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 7,734 points. Launch price was $800.

Xeon X7350

The Xeon X7350 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 6 September 2007 (18 years ago). It is based on the Tigerton (2007) architecture. It features 6 cores and 6 threads. Base frequency is 2.93 GHz, with boost up to 0.93 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 4 MB (total). Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: PGA604. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 7,836 points. Launch price was $2,301.

⚡

Processing Power

The Xeon E5-2620 v3 packs 6 cores / 12 threads, matching the Xeon X7350's 6 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the Xeon E5-2620 v3 versus 0.93 GHz on the Xeon X7350 — a 109.9% clock advantage for the Xeon E5-2620 v3 (base: 2.4 GHz vs 2.93 GHz). The Xeon E5-2620 v3 uses the Haswell-EP (2014−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the Xeon X7350 uses Tigerton (2007) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon E5-2620 v3 scores 7,734 against the Xeon X7350's 7,836 — a 1.3% lead for the Xeon X7350. L3 cache: 15 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-2620 v3 vs 8 MB L2 Cache on the Xeon X7350.

Feature	Xeon E5-2620 v3	Xeon X7350
Cores / Threads	6 / 12	6 / 6
Boost Clock	3.2 GHz+244%	0.93 GHz
Base Clock	2.4 GHz	2.93 GHz+22%
L3 Cache	15 MB (total)+88%	8 MB L2 Cache
L2 Cache	256K (per core)+6300%	4 MB (total)
Process	22 nm-66%	65 nm
Architecture	Haswell-EP (2014−2015)	Tigerton (2007)
PassMark	7,734	7,836+1%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon E5-2620 v3 uses the LGA2011 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon X7350 uses PGA604 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-1866 on the Xeon E5-2620 v3 versus DDR2-667 on the Xeon X7350 — the Xeon E5-2620 v3 supports 179.8% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both feature 4-channel memory with ECC support. Chipset compatibility: Intel X99,Intel C612 (Xeon E5-2620 v3) and Intel 7300 (Xeon X7350).

Feature	Xeon E5-2620 v3	Xeon X7350
Socket	LGA2011	PGA604
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-1866+180%	DDR2-667
Max RAM Capacity	768 GB	—
RAM Channels	4	4
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	40	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the Xeon E5-2620 v3 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Xeon E5-2620 v3) vs VT-x (Xeon X7350). Primary use case: Xeon E5-2620 v3 targets Server, Xeon X7350 targets Server. Direct competitor: Xeon X7350 rivals Core i3-2100.