Xeon E5-2667 v4 vs Xeon Silver 4215

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Xeon E5-2667 v4 vs Xeon Silver 4215 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Xeon E5-2667 v4 vs Xeon Silver 4215: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Xeon E5-2667 v4

2016

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +3.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+127.3% larger total L3 cache (25 MB vs 11 MB).

Trade-offs

❌58.8% higher power demand at 135W vs 85W.

Xeon Silver 4215

2019

Why buy it

✅Draws 85W instead of 135W, a 50W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E5-2667 v4 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (13,728 vs 13,776).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (11 MB vs 25 MB).

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon E5-2667 v4 better than Xeon Silver 4215?

Yes. Xeon E5-2667 v4 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 3.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.3% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon E5-2667 v4 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 3.2% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E5-2667 v4 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.3% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 127.3% larger total L3 cache (25 MB vs 11 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon E5-2667 v4 still makes the most sense overall. Xeon E5-2667 v4 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 3.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon Silver 4215 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2019 vs 2016). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Xeon E5-2667 v4 vs Xeon Silver 4215 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Xeon E5-2667 v4

The Xeon E5-2667 v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 June 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 25 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 135 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 13,776 points. Launch price was $2,057.

Xeon Silver 4215

The Xeon Silver 4215 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 April 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 11 MB. L2 cache: 8 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 85 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 13,728 points. Launch price was $794.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Xeon E5-2667 v4 and Xeon Silver 4215 share an identical 8-core/16-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.6 GHz on the Xeon E5-2667 v4 versus 3.5 GHz on the Xeon Silver 4215 — a 2.8% clock advantage for the Xeon E5-2667 v4 (base: 3.2 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The Xeon E5-2667 v4 uses the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon Silver 4215 uses Cascade Lake (2019−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon E5-2667 v4 scores 13,776 against the Xeon Silver 4215's 13,728 — a 0.3% lead for the Xeon E5-2667 v4. L3 cache: 25 MB on the Xeon E5-2667 v4 vs 11 MB on the Xeon Silver 4215.

Feature	Xeon E5-2667 v4	Xeon Silver 4215
Cores / Threads	8 / 16	8 / 16
Boost Clock	3.6 GHz+3%	3.5 GHz
Base Clock	3.2 GHz+28%	2.5 GHz
L3 Cache	25 MB+127%	11 MB
L2 Cache	2 MB	8 MB+300%
Process	14 nm	14 nm
Architecture	Broadwell (2015−2019)	Cascade Lake (2019−2020)
PassMark	13,776	13,728

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon E5-2667 v4 uses the LGA2011 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon Silver 4215 uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.