Xeon E5-2667 v4 vs Xeon W-1250

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Xeon E5-2667 v4 vs Xeon W-1250 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Xeon E5-2667 v4 vs Xeon W-1250: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Xeon E5-2667 v4

2016

Why buy it

✅+0.8% higher PassMark.
✅+108.3% larger total L3 cache (25 MB vs 12 MB).

Trade-offs

❌68.8% higher power demand at 135W vs 80W.

Xeon W-1250

2020

Why buy it

✅Draws 80W instead of 135W, a 55W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (13,671 vs 13,776).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 25 MB).
❌Launch MSRP is still $285 MSRP, while Xeon E5-2667 v4 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon W-1250 better than Xeon E5-2667 v4?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Xeon W-1250 is ahead with 30.6% higher max boost clock. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E5-2667 v4 pulls ahead with 0.8% better PassMark. Xeon E5-2667 v4 also has the bigger cache pool with 108.3% larger total L3 cache (25 MB vs 12 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E5-2667 v4 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.8% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 108.3% larger total L3 cache (25 MB vs 12 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon W-1250 is the better buy right now. Xeon W-1250 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $285 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 30.6% higher max boost clock. The compromise is that Xeon E5-2667 v4 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 0.8% better PassMark. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (48.0 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon W-1250 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2020 vs 2016). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Xeon E5-2667 v4 vs Xeon W-1250 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Xeon E5-2667 v4

The Xeon E5-2667 v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 June 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 25 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 135 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 13,776 points. Launch price was $2,057.

Xeon W-1250

The Xeon W-1250 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.7 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB Intel® Smart Cache. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 13,671 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The Xeon E5-2667 v4 packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon W-1250 offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Xeon E5-2667 v4 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.6 GHz on the Xeon E5-2667 v4 versus 4.7 GHz on the Xeon W-1250 — a 26.5% clock advantage for the Xeon W-1250 (base: 3.2 GHz vs 3.3 GHz). The Xeon E5-2667 v4 is built on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. In PassMark, the Xeon E5-2667 v4 scores 13,776 against the Xeon W-1250's 13,671 — a 0.8% lead for the Xeon E5-2667 v4. L3 cache: 25 MB on the Xeon E5-2667 v4 vs 12 MB Intel® Smart Cache on the Xeon W-1250.

Feature	Xeon E5-2667 v4	Xeon W-1250
Cores / Threads	8 / 16+33%	6 / 12
Boost Clock	3.6 GHz	4.7 GHz+31%
Base Clock	3.2 GHz	3.3 GHz+3%
L3 Cache	25 MB+108%	12 MB Intel® Smart Cache
L2 Cache	2 MB	—
Process	14 nm	14 nm
Architecture	Broadwell (2015−2019)	—
PassMark	13,776	13,671

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon E5-2667 v4 uses the LGA2011 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon W-1250 uses LGA1200 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.