Xeon E5-2679 v4 vs Xeon Gold 6222V

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Xeon E5-2679 v4 vs Xeon Gold 6222V FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Xeon E5-2679 v4 vs Xeon Gold 6222V: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Xeon E5-2679 v4

2016

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +7.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+81.8% larger total L3 cache (50 MB vs 28 MB).
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (40 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (24,131 vs 24,254).
❌Launch MSRP is still $2,702 MSRP, while Xeon Gold 6222V mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌73.9% higher power demand at 200W vs 115W.

Xeon Gold 6222V

2019

Why buy it

✅+0.5% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 115W instead of 200W, a 85W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E5-2679 v4 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Smaller total L3 cache (28 MB vs 50 MB).

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon Gold 6222V better than Xeon E5-2679 v4?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Xeon E5-2679 v4 is ahead with a 7.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Gold 6222V pulls ahead with 0.5% better PassMark. Xeon E5-2679 v4 also has the bigger cache pool with 81.8% larger total L3 cache (50 MB vs 28 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Gold 6222V is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.5% better PassMark, backed by 20 cores and 40 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon Gold 6222V is still the faster CPU overall, but Xeon E5-2679 v4 is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Xeon Gold 6222V comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $2,702 MSRP, and it still gives you 0.5% better PassMark. The compromise is that Xeon E5-2679 v4 is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 7.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Xeon E5-2679 v4 is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (8.9 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon Gold 6222V makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2019 vs 2016) and more multi-core headroom with 20 cores / 40 threads instead of 20/40. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Xeon E5-2679 v4 vs Xeon Gold 6222V Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Xeon E5-2679 v4

The Xeon E5-2679 v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. It features 20 cores and 40 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 50 MB. L2 cache: 5 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011-3. Thermal design power (TDP): 200 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 24,131 points. Launch price was $800.

Xeon Gold 6222V

The Xeon Gold 6222V is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 April 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture. It features 20 cores and 40 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 27.5 MB. L2 cache: 20 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 115 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 24,254 points. Launch price was $1,600.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Xeon E5-2679 v4 and Xeon Gold 6222V share an identical 20-core/40-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.3 GHz on the Xeon E5-2679 v4 versus 3.6 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6222V — a 8.7% clock advantage for the Xeon Gold 6222V (base: 2.5 GHz vs 1.8 GHz). The Xeon E5-2679 v4 uses the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon Gold 6222V uses Cascade Lake (2019−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon E5-2679 v4 scores 24,131 against the Xeon Gold 6222V's 24,254 — a 0.5% lead for the Xeon Gold 6222V. L3 cache: 50 MB on the Xeon E5-2679 v4 vs 27.5 MB on the Xeon Gold 6222V.

Feature	Xeon E5-2679 v4	Xeon Gold 6222V
Cores / Threads	20 / 40	20 / 40
Boost Clock	3.3 GHz	3.6 GHz+9%
Base Clock	2.5 GHz+39%	1.8 GHz
L3 Cache	50 MB+82%	27.5 MB
L2 Cache	5 MB	20 MB+300%
Process	14 nm	14 nm
Architecture	Broadwell (2015−2019)	Cascade Lake (2019−2020)
PassMark	24,131	24,254
Geekbench 6 Single	1,000	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	12,000	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon E5-2679 v4 uses the LGA2011-3 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon Gold 6222V uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Xeon E5-2679 v4	Xeon Gold 6222V
Socket	LGA2011-3	LGA3647
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2400	—
Max RAM Capacity	1536 GB	—
RAM Channels	4	—
ECC Support	Yes	—
PCIe Lanes	40	—