
Xeon E5-2679 v4

Xeon W-1390
Xeon E5-2679 v4 vs Xeon W-1390 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Xeon E5-2679 v4 vs Xeon W-1390 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Xeon E5-2679 v4 vs Xeon W-1390: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Xeon E5-2679 v4
2016Why buy it
- β Better for gaming: +3.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- β +212.5% larger total L3 cache (50 MB vs 16 MB).
- β 100+% more PCIe lanes (40 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- βLower PassMark per dollar, at 8.9 vs 48.4 PassMark/$ ($2,702 MSRP vs $494 MSRP).
- β150% higher power demand at 200W vs 80W.
Xeon W-1390
2021Why buy it
- β Costs $2,208 less on MSRP ($494 MSRP vs $2,702 MSRP).
- β Delivers 441.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 48.4 vs 8.9 PassMark/$ ($494 MSRP vs $2,702 MSRP).
- β Draws 80W instead of 200W, a 120W reduction.
Trade-offs
- βWorse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E5-2679 v4 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- βLower PassMark (23,902 vs 24,131).
- βSmaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 50 MB).
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon E5-2679 v4 better than Xeon W-1390?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Xeon E5-2679 v4 vs Xeon W-1390 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Xeon E5-2679 v4
The Xeon E5-2679 v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Broadwell (2015β2019) architecture. It features 20 cores and 40 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 50 MB. L2 cache: 5 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011-3. Thermal design power (TDP): 200 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 24,131 points. Launch price was $800.

Xeon W-1390
The Xeon W-1390 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 6 May 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Rocket Lake-S (2021) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 23,902 points. Launch price was $494.
Processing Power
The Xeon E5-2679 v4 packs 20 cores / 40 threads, while the Xeon W-1390 offers 8 cores / 16 threads β the Xeon E5-2679 v4 has 12 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.3 GHz on the Xeon E5-2679 v4 versus 5.1 GHz on the Xeon W-1390 β a 42.9% clock advantage for the Xeon W-1390 (base: 2.5 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The Xeon E5-2679 v4 uses the Broadwell (2015β2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon W-1390 uses Rocket Lake-S (2021) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon E5-2679 v4 scores 24,131 against the Xeon W-1390's 23,902 β a 1% lead for the Xeon E5-2679 v4. L3 cache: 50 MB on the Xeon E5-2679 v4 vs 16 MB (total) on the Xeon W-1390.
| Feature | Xeon E5-2679 v4 | Xeon W-1390 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 20 / 40+150% | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 3.3 GHz | 5.1 GHz+55% |
| Base Clock | 2.5 GHz | 2.8 GHz+12% |
| L3 Cache | 50 MB+213% | 16 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 5 MB+900% | 512 kB (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Broadwell (2015β2019) | Rocket Lake-S (2021) |
| PassMark | 24,131 | 23,902 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,000 | β |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 12,000 | β |
Memory & Platform
The Xeon E5-2679 v4 uses the LGA2011-3 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon W-1390 uses LGA1200 (PCIe 4.0) β making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Xeon E5-2679 v4 | Xeon W-1390 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA2011-3 | LGA1200 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 4.0+33% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2400 | β |
| Max RAM Capacity | 1536 GB | β |
| RAM Channels | 4 | β |
| ECC Support | Yes | β |
| PCIe Lanes | 40 | β |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: Yes (Xeon E5-2679 v4) / not specified (Xeon W-1390).
| Feature | Xeon E5-2679 v4 | Xeon W-1390 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | β |
| AVX-512 | No | β |
| Virtualization | Yes | β |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Xeon E5-2679 v4 was priced at $2702, while the Xeon W-1390 came in at $494. On launch pricing ($2702 vs $494), Xeon W-1390 was $2208 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon E5-2679 v4 delivers 8.9 pts/$ vs 48.4 pts/$ for the Xeon W-1390 β making the Xeon W-1390 the 137.7% better value option.
| Feature | Xeon E5-2679 v4 | Xeon W-1390 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2702 | $494-82% |
| Performance per Dollar | 8.9 | 48.4+444% |
| Release Date | 2016 | 2021 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














