Xeon E5-2687W v2 vs Xeon E5-2692 v2

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Xeon E5-2687W v2 vs Xeon E5-2692 v2 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Xeon E5-2687W v2 vs Xeon E5-2692 v2: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Xeon E5-2687W v2

2013

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +9.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (20 MB vs 30 MB).
❌Launch MSRP is still $2,112 MSRP, while Xeon E5-2692 v2 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌50% higher power demand at 150W vs 100W.

Xeon E5-2692 v2

2013

Why buy it

✅+50% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 20 MB).
✅Draws 100W instead of 150W, a 50W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E5-2687W v2 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (12,119 vs 12,301).

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon E5-2687W v2 better than Xeon E5-2692 v2?

Yes. Xeon E5-2687W v2 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 9.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 1.5% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon E5-2687W v2 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 9.6% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E5-2687W v2 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.5% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon E5-2687W v2 is the better buy right now. Xeon E5-2687W v2 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $2,112 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 9.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (5.8 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon E5-2692 v2 is the safer long-term CPU choice because it gives you more room to grow and a better platform outlook.

Xeon E5-2687W v2 vs Xeon E5-2692 v2 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Xeon E5-2687W v2

The Xeon E5-2687W v2 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge-EP (2013) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 150 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 12,301 points. Launch price was $1,605.

Xeon E5-2692 v2

The Xeon E5-2692 v2 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Ivy Bridge-EP (2013) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 100 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 12,119 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The Xeon E5-2687W v2 packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon E5-2692 v2 offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the Xeon E5-2692 v2 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4 GHz on the Xeon E5-2687W v2 versus 3 GHz on the Xeon E5-2692 v2 — a 28.6% clock advantage for the Xeon E5-2687W v2 (base: 3.4 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). Both are built on the Ivy Bridge-EP (2013) architecture using a 22 nm process. In PassMark, the Xeon E5-2687W v2 scores 12,301 against the Xeon E5-2692 v2's 12,119 — a 1.5% lead for the Xeon E5-2687W v2. L3 cache: 20 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-2687W v2 vs 30 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-2692 v2.

Feature	Xeon E5-2687W v2	Xeon E5-2692 v2
Cores / Threads	8 / 16	12 / 24+50%
Boost Clock	4 GHz+33%	3 GHz
Base Clock	3.4 GHz+55%	2.2 GHz
L3 Cache	20 MB (total)	30 MB (total)+50%
L2 Cache	256 kB (per core)	256 kB (per core)
Process	22 nm	22 nm
Architecture	Ivy Bridge-EP (2013)	Ivy Bridge-EP (2013)
PassMark	12,301+2%	12,119