Xeon E5-2687W v2 vs Xeon W-10855M

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Xeon E5-2687W v2 vs Xeon W-10855M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Xeon E5-2687W v2 vs Xeon W-10855M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Xeon E5-2687W v2

2013

Why buy it

✅+0.4% higher PassMark.
✅+66.7% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 12 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 5.8 vs 103.8 PassMark/$ ($2,112 MSRP vs $118 MSRP).
❌9900% higher power demand at 150W vs 1.5W.

Xeon W-10855M

2020

Why buy it

✅Costs $1,994 less on MSRP ($118 MSRP vs $2,112 MSRP).
✅Delivers 1682.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 103.8 vs 5.8 PassMark/$ ($118 MSRP vs $2,112 MSRP).
✅Draws 2W instead of 150W, a 149W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (12,249 vs 12,301).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 20 MB).

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon W-10855M better than Xeon E5-2687W v2?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Xeon W-10855M is ahead with a 0.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E5-2687W v2 pulls ahead with 0.4% better PassMark. Xeon E5-2687W v2 also has the bigger cache pool with 66.7% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 12 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E5-2687W v2 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.4% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 66.7% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 12 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon W-10855M is the better buy right now. Xeon W-10855M comes in $1,994 cheaper on MSRP at $118 MSRP versus $2,112 MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Xeon E5-2687W v2 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 0.4% better PassMark. It is also 1682.3% better value on MSRP (103.8 vs 5.8 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon W-10855M makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2020 vs 2013). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Xeon E5-2687W v2 vs Xeon W-10855M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Xeon E5-2687W v2

The Xeon E5-2687W v2 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge-EP (2013) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 150 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 12,301 points. Launch price was $1,605.

Xeon W-10855M

The Xeon W-10855M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Comet Lake-H (2020) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB. L2 cache: 1.5 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1440. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 12,249 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The Xeon E5-2687W v2 packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon W-10855M offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Xeon E5-2687W v2 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4 GHz on the Xeon E5-2687W v2 versus 4.9 GHz on the Xeon W-10855M — a 20.2% clock advantage for the Xeon W-10855M (base: 3.4 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The Xeon E5-2687W v2 uses the Ivy Bridge-EP (2013) architecture (22 nm), while the Xeon W-10855M uses Comet Lake-H (2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon E5-2687W v2 scores 12,301 against the Xeon W-10855M's 12,249 — a 0.4% lead for the Xeon E5-2687W v2. L3 cache: 20 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-2687W v2 vs 12 MB on the Xeon W-10855M.

Feature	Xeon E5-2687W v2	Xeon W-10855M
Cores / Threads	8 / 16+33%	6 / 12
Boost Clock	4 GHz	4.9 GHz+23%
Base Clock	3.4 GHz+21%	2.8 GHz
L3 Cache	20 MB (total)+67%	12 MB
L2 Cache	256 kB (per core)	1.5 MB+500%
Process	22 nm	14 nm-36%
Architecture	Ivy Bridge-EP (2013)	Comet Lake-H (2020)
PassMark	12,301	12,249

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon E5-2687W v2 uses the LGA2011 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon W-10855M uses BGA1440 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Xeon E5-2687W v2	Xeon W-10855M
Socket	LGA2011	BGA1440
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 5.0+67%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Xeon E5-2687W v2 was priced at $2112, while the Xeon W-10855M came in at $118. On launch pricing ($2112 vs $118), Xeon W-10855M was $1994 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon E5-2687W v2 delivers 5.8 pts/$ vs 103.8 pts/$ for the Xeon W-10855M — making the Xeon W-10855M the 178.7% better value option.

Feature	Xeon E5-2687W v2	Xeon W-10855M
MSRP	$2112	$118-94%
Performance per Dollar	5.8	103.8+1690%
Release Date	2013	2020

Search Xeon E5-2687W v2 on Amazon

Search Xeon W-10855M on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.