Xeon E5-2618L v4 vs Xeon E5-2687W v2

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Xeon E5-2618L v4 vs Xeon E5-2687W v2 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Xeon E5-2618L v4 vs Xeon E5-2687W v2: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Xeon E5-2618L v4

2016

Why buy it

✅+1% higher PassMark.
✅+25% larger total L3 cache (25 MB vs 20 MB).
✅Costs $1,333 less on MSRP ($779 MSRP vs $2,112 MSRP).
✅Delivers 173.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 16.0 vs 5.8 PassMark/$ ($779 MSRP vs $2,112 MSRP).
✅Draws 75W instead of 150W, a 75W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E5-2687W v2 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Xeon E5-2687W v2

2013

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +11.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (12,301 vs 12,429).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (20 MB vs 25 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 5.8 vs 16.0 PassMark/$ ($2,112 MSRP vs $779 MSRP).
❌100% higher power demand at 150W vs 75W.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon E5-2618L v4 better than Xeon E5-2687W v2?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Xeon E5-2687W v2 is ahead with a 11.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E5-2618L v4 pulls ahead with 1% better PassMark. Xeon E5-2618L v4 also has the bigger cache pool with 25% larger total L3 cache (25 MB vs 20 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E5-2618L v4 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1% better PassMark, backed by 10 cores and 20 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 25% larger total L3 cache (25 MB vs 20 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon E5-2618L v4 is the better buy right now. Xeon E5-2618L v4 comes in $1,333 cheaper on MSRP at $779 MSRP versus $2,112 MSRP, and it still gives you 1% better PassMark. The compromise is that Xeon E5-2687W v2 is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 11.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 173.9% better value on MSRP (16.0 vs 5.8 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon E5-2618L v4 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2016 vs 2013), 25% larger total L3 cache (25 MB vs 20 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 10 cores / 20 threads instead of 8/16. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Xeon E5-2618L v4 vs Xeon E5-2687W v2 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Xeon E5-2618L v4

The Xeon E5-2618L v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 June 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. It features 10 cores and 20 threads. Max frequency: 2.2 GHz. L3 cache: 25 MB. L2 cache: 2.5 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Thermal design power (TDP): 75 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 12,429 points. Launch price was $779.

Xeon E5-2687W v2

The Xeon E5-2687W v2 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge-EP (2013) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 150 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 12,301 points. Launch price was $1,605.

⚡

Processing Power

The Xeon E5-2618L v4 packs 10 cores / 20 threads, while the Xeon E5-2687W v2 offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Xeon E5-2618L v4 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.2 GHz on the Xeon E5-2618L v4 versus 4 GHz on the Xeon E5-2687W v2 — a 58.1% clock advantage for the Xeon E5-2687W v2. The Xeon E5-2618L v4 uses the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon E5-2687W v2 uses Ivy Bridge-EP (2013) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon E5-2618L v4 scores 12,429 against the Xeon E5-2687W v2's 12,301 — a 1% lead for the Xeon E5-2618L v4. L3 cache: 25 MB on the Xeon E5-2618L v4 vs 20 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-2687W v2.

Feature	Xeon E5-2618L v4	Xeon E5-2687W v2
Cores / Threads	10 / 20+25%	8 / 16
Boost Clock	2.2 GHz	4 GHz+82%
Base Clock	—	3.4 GHz
L3 Cache	25 MB+25%	20 MB (total)
L2 Cache	2.5 MB+900%	256 kB (per core)
Process	14 nm-36%	22 nm
Architecture	Broadwell (2015−2019)	Ivy Bridge-EP (2013)
PassMark	12,429+1%	12,301

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Xeon E5-2618L v4 was priced at $779, while the Xeon E5-2687W v2 came in at $2112. On launch pricing ($779 vs $2112), Xeon E5-2618L v4 was $1333 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon E5-2618L v4 delivers 16.0 pts/$ vs 5.8 pts/$ for the Xeon E5-2687W v2 — making the Xeon E5-2618L v4 the 93% better value option.

Feature	Xeon E5-2618L v4	Xeon E5-2687W v2
MSRP	$779-63%	$2112
Performance per Dollar	16.0+176%	5.8
Release Date	2016	2013

Search Xeon E5-2618L v4 on Amazon

Search Xeon E5-2687W v2 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.