Xeon E5-2692 v2 vs Xeon W-10855M

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Xeon E5-2692 v2 vs Xeon W-10855M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Xeon E5-2692 v2 vs Xeon W-10855M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Xeon E5-2692 v2

2013

Why buy it

✅+150% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 12 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon W-10855M across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (12,119 vs 12,249).
❌6566.7% higher power demand at 100W vs 1.5W.

Xeon W-10855M

2020

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +9.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 2W instead of 100W, a 99W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 30 MB).
❌Launch MSRP is still $118 MSRP, while Xeon E5-2692 v2 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon W-10855M better than Xeon E5-2692 v2?

Yes. Xeon W-10855M is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 9.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 1.1% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon W-10855M is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 9.3% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon W-10855M is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.1% better PassMark, backed by 6 cores and 12 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon W-10855M is the better buy right now. Xeon W-10855M comes in at an unclear MSRP at $118 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 9.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (103.8 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon W-10855M makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2020 vs 2013) and more multi-core headroom with 6 cores / 12 threads instead of 12/24. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Xeon E5-2692 v2 vs Xeon W-10855M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Xeon E5-2692 v2

The Xeon E5-2692 v2 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Ivy Bridge-EP (2013) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 100 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 12,119 points. Launch price was $800.

Xeon W-10855M

The Xeon W-10855M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Comet Lake-H (2020) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB. L2 cache: 1.5 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1440. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 12,249 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The Xeon E5-2692 v2 packs 12 cores / 24 threads, while the Xeon W-10855M offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Xeon E5-2692 v2 has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3 GHz on the Xeon E5-2692 v2 versus 4.9 GHz on the Xeon W-10855M — a 48.1% clock advantage for the Xeon W-10855M (base: 2.2 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The Xeon E5-2692 v2 uses the Ivy Bridge-EP (2013) architecture (22 nm), while the Xeon W-10855M uses Comet Lake-H (2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon E5-2692 v2 scores 12,119 against the Xeon W-10855M's 12,249 — a 1.1% lead for the Xeon W-10855M. L3 cache: 30 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-2692 v2 vs 12 MB on the Xeon W-10855M.

Feature	Xeon E5-2692 v2	Xeon W-10855M
Cores / Threads	12 / 24+100%	6 / 12
Boost Clock	3 GHz	4.9 GHz+63%
Base Clock	2.2 GHz	2.8 GHz+27%
L3 Cache	30 MB (total)+150%	12 MB
L2 Cache	256 kB (per core)	1.5 MB+500%
Process	22 nm	14 nm-36%
Architecture	Ivy Bridge-EP (2013)	Comet Lake-H (2020)
PassMark	12,119	12,249+1%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon E5-2692 v2 uses the LGA2011 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon W-10855M uses BGA1440 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.