Xeon W-3275M vs Core Ultra 5 235HX
Xeon W-3275M
Core Ultra 5 235HX
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Xeon W-3275M
Performance Per Dollar Core Ultra 5 235HX
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Xeon W-3275M | Core Ultra 5 235HX |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($4,449) | ✅ More affordable ($0) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Cascade Lake (2019−2020) / 14 nm) | ✨ Modern (Arrow Lake-HX (2025) / 3 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Xeon W-3275M | Core Ultra 5 235HX |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($4,449) | ✅ More affordable ($0) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Xeon W-3275M and Core Ultra 5 235HX
Xeon W-3275M
The Xeon W-3275M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 June 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture. It features 28 cores and 56 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 38.5 MB. L2 cache: 28 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 205 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 40,419 points. Launch price was $7,453.
Core Ultra 5 235HX
The Core Ultra 5 235HX is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 13 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Arrow Lake-HX (2025) architecture. It features 14 cores and 14 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 3 MB (per core). Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2114. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-6400. Passmark benchmark score: 40,122 points. Launch price was $499.
Processing Power
The Xeon W-3275M packs 28 cores / 56 threads, while the Core Ultra 5 235HX offers 14 cores / 14 threads — the Xeon W-3275M has 14 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Xeon W-3275M versus 5.1 GHz on the Core Ultra 5 235HX — a 10.3% clock advantage for the Core Ultra 5 235HX (base: 2.5 GHz vs 2.9 GHz). The Xeon W-3275M uses the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture (14 nm), while the Core Ultra 5 235HX uses Arrow Lake-HX (2025) (3 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon W-3275M scores 40,419 against the Core Ultra 5 235HX's 40,122 — a 0.7% lead for the Xeon W-3275M. L3 cache: 38.5 MB on the Xeon W-3275M vs 24 MB (total) on the Core Ultra 5 235HX.
| Feature | Xeon W-3275M | Core Ultra 5 235HX |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 28 / 56+100% | 14 / 14 |
| Boost Clock | 4.6 GHz | 5.1 GHz+11% |
| Base Clock | 2.5 GHz | 2.9 GHz+16% |
| L3 Cache | 38.5 MB+60% | 24 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 28 MB+833% | 3 MB (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm | 3 nm-79% |
| Architecture | Cascade Lake (2019−2020) | Arrow Lake-HX (2025) |
| PassMark | 40,419 | 40,122 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 21,677 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 2,600 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 14,000 |
Memory & Platform
The Xeon W-3275M uses the LGA3647 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core Ultra 5 235HX uses FCBGA2114 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 2933 on the Xeon W-3275M versus DDR5-6400 on the Core Ultra 5 235HX — the Xeon W-3275M supports 199.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon W-3275M supports up to 2048 of RAM compared to 192 GB — 165.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 6 (Xeon W-3275M) vs 2 (Core Ultra 5 235HX). PCIe lanes: 64 (Xeon W-3275M) vs 24 (Core Ultra 5 235HX) — the Xeon W-3275M offers 40 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: C620 (Xeon W-3275M) and HM870,WM880 (Core Ultra 5 235HX).
| Feature | Xeon W-3275M | Core Ultra 5 235HX |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA3647 | FCBGA2114 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 5.0+67% |
| Max RAM Speed | 2933+58560% | DDR5-6400 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 2048 | 192 GB+9830300% |
| RAM Channels | 6+200% | 2 |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 64+167% | 24 |
Advanced Features
Only the Core Ultra 5 235HX has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Xeon W-3275M supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. The Core Ultra 5 235HX includes integrated graphics (Intel Graphics (48EU)), while the Xeon W-3275M requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core Ultra 5 235HX targets Laptop. Direct competitor: Xeon W-3275M rivals EPYC 7742.
| Feature | Xeon W-3275M | Core Ultra 5 235HX |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | None | Intel Graphics (48EU) |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | Yes | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | — | Laptop |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Xeon W-3275M and Core Ultra 5 235HX
