CPU
GPU
Xeon W-3275M
Xeon Gold 6416H
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Xeon W-3275M
Performance Per Dollar Xeon Gold 6416H
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Xeon W-3275M | Xeon Gold 6416H |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($4,449) | ✅ More affordable ($1,845) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Cascade Lake (2019−2020) / 14 nm) | ✨ Modern (Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) / Intel 7 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Xeon W-3275M | Xeon Gold 6416H |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+142%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($4,449) | ✅ More affordable ($1,845) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Xeon W-3275M and Xeon Gold 6416H
Xeon W-3275M
The Xeon W-3275M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 June 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture. It features 28 cores and 56 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 38.5 MB. L2 cache: 28 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 205 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 40,419 points. Launch price was $7,453.
Xeon Gold 6416H
The Xeon Gold 6416H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 10 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture. It features 18 cores and 36 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 45 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 165 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR5-4400. Passmark benchmark score: 40,606 points. Launch price was $1,444.
Processing Power
The Xeon W-3275M packs 28 cores / 56 threads, while the Xeon Gold 6416H offers 18 cores / 36 threads — the Xeon W-3275M has 10 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Xeon W-3275M versus 4.2 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6416H — a 9.1% clock advantage for the Xeon W-3275M (base: 2.5 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). The Xeon W-3275M uses the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon Gold 6416H uses Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon W-3275M scores 40,419 against the Xeon Gold 6416H's 40,606 — a 0.5% lead for the Xeon Gold 6416H. L3 cache: 38.5 MB on the Xeon W-3275M vs 45 MB on the Xeon Gold 6416H.
| Feature | Xeon W-3275M | Xeon Gold 6416H |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 28 / 56+56% | 18 / 36 |
| Boost Clock | 4.6 GHz+10% | 4.2 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.5 GHz+14% | 2.2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 38.5 MB | 45 MB+17% |
| L2 Cache | 28 MB+1300% | 2 MB (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm | Intel 7 nm-50% |
| Architecture | Cascade Lake (2019−2020) | Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) |
| PassMark | 40,419 | 40,606 |
Memory & Platform
The Xeon W-3275M uses the LGA3647 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon Gold 6416H uses LGA4677 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 2933 on the Xeon W-3275M versus 4800 on the Xeon Gold 6416H — the Xeon Gold 6416H supports 48.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon Gold 6416H supports up to 4096 of RAM compared to 2048 — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 6 (Xeon W-3275M) vs 8 (Xeon Gold 6416H). PCIe lanes: 64 (Xeon W-3275M) vs 80 (Xeon Gold 6416H) — the Xeon Gold 6416H offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: C620 (Xeon W-3275M) and LGA4677 (Xeon Gold 6416H).
| Feature | Xeon W-3275M | Xeon Gold 6416H |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA3647 | LGA4677 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 5.0+67% |
| Max RAM Speed | 2933 | 4800+64% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 2048 | 4096+100% |
| RAM Channels | 6 | 8+33% |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 64 | 80+25% |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. Direct competitor: Xeon W-3275M rivals EPYC 7742; Xeon Gold 6416H rivals EPYC 9254.
| Feature | Xeon W-3275M | Xeon Gold 6416H |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | None |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | VT-x, VT-d |
Value Analysis
The Xeon W-3275M launched at $4449 MSRP, while the Xeon Gold 6416H debuted at $1845.
| Feature | Xeon W-3275M | Xeon Gold 6416H |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $4449 | $1845-59% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $4449 | — |
| Release Date | 2019 | 2023 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Xeon W-3275M and Xeon Gold 6416H
