Xeon W-3275M vs Core Ultra 5 245
Xeon W-3275M
Core Ultra 5 245
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Xeon W-3275M
Performance Per Dollar Core Ultra 5 245
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Xeon W-3275M | Core Ultra 5 245 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($4,449) | ✅ More affordable ($220) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Cascade Lake (2019−2020) / 14 nm) | ✨ Modern (Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) / 3 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Xeon W-3275M | Core Ultra 5 245 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+1910%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($4,449) | ✅ More affordable ($220) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Xeon W-3275M and Core Ultra 5 245
Xeon W-3275M
The Xeon W-3275M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 June 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture. It features 28 cores and 56 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 38.5 MB. L2 cache: 28 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 205 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 40,419 points. Launch price was $7,453.
Core Ultra 5 245
The Core Ultra 5 245 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 7 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) architecture. It features 14 cores and 14 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 3 MB (per core). Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1851. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-6400. Passmark benchmark score: 40,165 points. Launch price was $270.
Processing Power
The Xeon W-3275M packs 28 cores / 56 threads, while the Core Ultra 5 245 offers 14 cores / 14 threads — the Xeon W-3275M has 14 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Xeon W-3275M versus 5.1 GHz on the Core Ultra 5 245 — a 10.3% clock advantage for the Core Ultra 5 245 (base: 2.5 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The Xeon W-3275M uses the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture (14 nm), while the Core Ultra 5 245 uses Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) (3 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon W-3275M scores 40,419 against the Core Ultra 5 245's 40,165 — a 0.6% lead for the Xeon W-3275M. L3 cache: 38.5 MB on the Xeon W-3275M vs 24 MB (total) on the Core Ultra 5 245.
| Feature | Xeon W-3275M | Core Ultra 5 245 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 28 / 56+100% | 14 / 14 |
| Boost Clock | 4.6 GHz | 5.1 GHz+11% |
| Base Clock | 2.5 GHz | 3.5 GHz+40% |
| L3 Cache | 38.5 MB+60% | 24 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 28 MB+833% | 3 MB (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm | 3 nm-79% |
| Architecture | Cascade Lake (2019−2020) | Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) |
| PassMark | 40,419 | 40,165 |
Memory & Platform
The Xeon W-3275M uses the LGA3647 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core Ultra 5 245 uses LGA1851 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 2933 on the Xeon W-3275M versus 6400 on the Core Ultra 5 245 — the Core Ultra 5 245 supports 74.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon W-3275M supports up to 2048 of RAM compared to 256 — 155.6% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 6 (Xeon W-3275M) vs 2 (Core Ultra 5 245). PCIe lanes: 64 (Xeon W-3275M) vs 20 (Core Ultra 5 245) — the Xeon W-3275M offers 44 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: C620 (Xeon W-3275M) and Z890,B860 (Core Ultra 5 245).
| Feature | Xeon W-3275M | Core Ultra 5 245 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA3647 | LGA1851 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 5.0+67% |
| Max RAM Speed | 2933 | 6400+118% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 2048+700% | 256 |
| RAM Channels | 6+200% | 2 |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 64+220% | 20 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the Xeon W-3275M supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. The Core Ultra 5 245 includes integrated graphics (Intel Arc Xe-LPG Graphics), while the Xeon W-3275M requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Xeon W-3275M rivals EPYC 7742; Core Ultra 5 245 rivals Ryzen 5 9600X.
| Feature | Xeon W-3275M | Core Ultra 5 245 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | None | Intel Arc Xe-LPG Graphics |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | VT-x, VT-d |
Value Analysis
The Xeon W-3275M launched at $4449 MSRP, while the Core Ultra 5 245 debuted at $319. At current prices ($4449 vs $220), the Core Ultra 5 245 is $4229 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon W-3275M delivers 9.1 pts/$ vs 182.6 pts/$ for the Core Ultra 5 245 — making the Core Ultra 5 245 the 181% better value option.
| Feature | Xeon W-3275M | Core Ultra 5 245 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $4449 | $319-93% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $4449 | $220-95% |
| Performance per Dollar | 9.1 | 182.6+1907% |
| Release Date | 2019 | 2025 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Xeon W-3275M and Core Ultra 5 245
