Xeon W-3275M vs Xeon w5-2545

Intel

Xeon W-3275M

28 Cores56 Thrd205 WWMax: 4.6 GHz2019
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Xeon w5-2545

12 Cores24 Thrd210 WWMax: 4.7 GHz2024
Similar parts
·······

Xeon W-3275M vs Xeon w5-2545 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Xeon W-3275M vs Xeon w5-2545 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Xeon W-3275M vs Xeon w5-2545: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Xeon W-3275M

2019

Why buy it

  • +28.3% larger total L3 cache (39 MB vs 30 MB).
  • Draws 205W instead of 210W, a 5W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (40,419 vs 40,782).
  • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 9.1 vs 45.9 PassMark/$ ($4,449 MSRP vs $889 MSRP).
  • Older platform position on LGA3647 with DDR4, while Xeon w5-2545 moves to LGA4677 and DDR5.

Xeon w5-2545

2024

Why buy it

  • Costs $3,560 less on MSRP ($889 MSRP vs $4,449 MSRP).
  • Delivers 404.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 45.9 vs 9.1 PassMark/$ ($889 MSRP vs $4,449 MSRP).
  • Newer platform on LGA4677 with DDR5 support instead of LGA3647 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

  • Smaller total L3 cache (30 MB vs 39 MB).

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon w5-2545 better than Xeon W-3275M?
Yes. Xeon w5-2545 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 1.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.9% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Xeon w5-2545 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 1.5% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon w5-2545 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.9% better PassMark, backed by 12 cores and 24 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Xeon w5-2545 is the better buy right now. Xeon w5-2545 comes in $3,560 cheaper on MSRP at $889 MSRP versus $4,449 MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 404.9% better value on MSRP (45.9 vs 9.1 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Xeon w5-2545 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2019), a healthier platform with LGA4677 and DDR5 instead of LGA3647, and more multi-core headroom with 12 cores / 24 threads instead of 28/56. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Xeon W-3275M vs Xeon w5-2545 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Xeon W-3275M

The Xeon W-3275M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 June 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture. It features 28 cores and 56 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 38.5 MB. L2 cache: 28 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 205 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 40,419 points. Launch price was $7,453.

Intel

Xeon w5-2545

The Xeon w5-2545 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 August 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.7 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 210 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 40,782 points. Launch price was $889.

Processing Power

The Xeon W-3275M packs 28 cores / 56 threads, while the Xeon w5-2545 offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the Xeon W-3275M has 16 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Xeon W-3275M versus 4.7 GHz on the Xeon w5-2545 — a 2.2% clock advantage for the Xeon w5-2545 (base: 2.5 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The Xeon W-3275M uses the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon w5-2545 uses Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon W-3275M scores 40,419 against the Xeon w5-2545's 40,782 — a 0.9% lead for the Xeon w5-2545. L3 cache: 38.5 MB on the Xeon W-3275M vs 30 MB on the Xeon w5-2545.

FeatureXeon W-3275MXeon w5-2545
Cores / Threads
28 / 56+133%
12 / 24
Boost Clock
4.6 GHz
4.7 GHz+2%
Base Clock
2.5 GHz
3.5 GHz+40%
L3 Cache
38.5 MB+28%
30 MB
L2 Cache
28 MB+1300%
2 MB (per core)
Process
14 nm
Intel 7 nm-50%
Architecture
Cascade Lake (2019−2020)
Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024)
PassMark
40,419
40,782
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon W-3275M uses the LGA3647 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon w5-2545 uses LGA4677 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 2933 on the Xeon W-3275M versus 4800 on the Xeon w5-2545 — the Xeon w5-2545 supports 63.7% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 2048 of RAM. Memory channels: 6 (Xeon W-3275M) vs 4 (Xeon w5-2545). Both provide 64 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: C620 (Xeon W-3275M) and W790 (Xeon w5-2545).

FeatureXeon W-3275MXeon w5-2545
Socket
LGA3647
LGA4677
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 4.0+33%
Max RAM Speed
2933
4800+64%
Max RAM Capacity
2048
2048
RAM Channels
6+50%
4
ECC Support
Yes
Yes
PCIe Lanes
64
64
🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Xeon w5-2545 has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. Direct competitor: Xeon W-3275M rivals EPYC 7742; Xeon w5-2545 rivals Threadripper 7960X.

FeatureXeon W-3275MXeon w5-2545
Integrated GPU
No
No
IGPU Model
None
None
Unlocked
No
Yes
AVX-512
Yes
Yes
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
VT-x, VT-d
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Xeon W-3275M was priced at $4449, while the Xeon w5-2545 came in at $889. On launch pricing ($4449 vs $889), Xeon w5-2545 was $3560 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon W-3275M delivers 9.1 pts/$ vs 45.9 pts/$ for the Xeon w5-2545 — making the Xeon w5-2545 the 133.9% better value option.

FeatureXeon W-3275MXeon w5-2545
MSRP
$4449
$889-80%
Performance per Dollar
9.1
45.9+404%
Release Date
2019
2024

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.