CPU
GPU
Xeon W-3275M
EPYC 7313P
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Xeon W-3275M
Performance Per Dollar EPYC 7313P
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Xeon W-3275M | EPYC 7313P |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($4,449) | ✅ More affordable ($824) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Cascade Lake (2019−2020) / 14 nm) | ✨ Modern (Milan (2021−2023) / 7 nm+) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Xeon W-3275M | EPYC 7313P |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+448%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($4,449) | ✅ More affordable ($824) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Xeon W-3275M and EPYC 7313P
Xeon W-3275M
The Xeon W-3275M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 June 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture. It features 28 cores and 56 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 38.5 MB. L2 cache: 28 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 205 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 40,419 points. Launch price was $7,453.
EPYC 7313P
The EPYC 7313P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 15 March 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Milan (2021−2023) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm+ process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 155 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 41,017 points. Launch price was $913.
Processing Power
The Xeon W-3275M packs 28 cores / 56 threads, while the EPYC 7313P offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the Xeon W-3275M has 12 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Xeon W-3275M versus 3.7 GHz on the EPYC 7313P — a 21.7% clock advantage for the Xeon W-3275M (base: 2.5 GHz vs 3 GHz). The Xeon W-3275M uses the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture (14 nm), while the EPYC 7313P uses Milan (2021−2023) (7 nm+). In PassMark, the Xeon W-3275M scores 40,419 against the EPYC 7313P's 41,017 — a 1.5% lead for the EPYC 7313P. L3 cache: 38.5 MB on the Xeon W-3275M vs 128 MB (total) on the EPYC 7313P.
| Feature | Xeon W-3275M | EPYC 7313P |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 28 / 56+75% | 16 / 32 |
| Boost Clock | 4.6 GHz+24% | 3.7 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.5 GHz | 3 GHz+20% |
| L3 Cache | 38.5 MB | 128 MB (total)+232% |
| L2 Cache | 28 MB+5500% | 512 kB (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm | 7 nm+-50% |
| Architecture | Cascade Lake (2019−2020) | Milan (2021−2023) |
| PassMark | 40,419 | 41,017+1% |
Memory & Platform
The Xeon W-3275M uses the LGA3647 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the EPYC 7313P uses SP3 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 2933 on the Xeon W-3275M versus 3200 on the EPYC 7313P — the EPYC 7313P supports 8.7% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 7313P supports up to 4096 of RAM compared to 2048 — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 6 (Xeon W-3275M) vs 8 (EPYC 7313P). PCIe lanes: 64 (Xeon W-3275M) vs 128 (EPYC 7313P) — the EPYC 7313P offers 64 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: C620 (Xeon W-3275M) and SP3 (EPYC 7313P).
| Feature | Xeon W-3275M | EPYC 7313P |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA3647 | SP3 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 4.0+33% |
| Max RAM Speed | 2933 | 3200+9% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 2048 | 4096+100% |
| RAM Channels | 6 | 8+33% |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 64 | 128+100% |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Xeon W-3275M) vs VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V (EPYC 7313P). Direct competitor: Xeon W-3275M rivals EPYC 7742; EPYC 7313P rivals Xeon Gold 6334.
| Feature | Xeon W-3275M | EPYC 7313P |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | None |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V |
Value Analysis
The Xeon W-3275M launched at $4449 MSRP, while the EPYC 7313P debuted at $913. At current prices ($4449 vs $824), the EPYC 7313P is $3625 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon W-3275M delivers 9.1 pts/$ vs 49.8 pts/$ for the EPYC 7313P — making the EPYC 7313P the 138.3% better value option.
| Feature | Xeon W-3275M | EPYC 7313P |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $4449 | $913-79% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $4449 | $824-81% |
| Performance per Dollar | 9.1 | 49.8+447% |
| Release Date | 2019 | 2021 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Xeon W-3275M and EPYC 7313P
