A10 Micro-6700T vs Xeon E3-1220L v3

A10 Micro-6700T vs Xeon E3-1220L v3 Performance Spectrum

A10 Micro-6700T

4 / 4

1,426

+1.4%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Xeon E3-1220L v3

2 / 4

1,407

0.0%

Celeron B820

Pentium Dual-Core E2180

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A10 Micro-6700T vs Xeon E3-1220L v3 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A10 Micro-6700T vs Xeon E3-1220L v3: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A10 Micro-6700T

2014

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +4.6% higher average FPS across 48 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 5W instead of 16W, a 11W reduction.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon R6, while Xeon E3-1220L v3 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E3-1220L v3, which brings 2 cores / 4 threads and 16 PCIe lanes.

Xeon E3-1220L v3

2013

Why buy it

✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 2 cores / 4 threads, plus 16 PCIe lanes vs 4.
✅300% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 4) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than A10 Micro-6700T across 48 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (1,407 vs 1,426).
❌Launch MSRP is still $193 MSRP, while A10 Micro-6700T mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌220% higher power demand at 16W vs 5W.
❌No integrated graphics, while A10 Micro-6700T can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is A10 Micro-6700T better than Xeon E3-1220L v3?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E3-1220L v3 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while A10 Micro-6700T is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, A10 Micro-6700T is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 4.6% more average FPS across 48 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, A10 Micro-6700T is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.4% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

A10 Micro-6700T is still the faster CPU overall, but Xeon E3-1220L v3 is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. A10 Micro-6700T comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $193 MSRP, and it still gives you a 4.6% average FPS lead across 48 shared CPU game tests in our data. Xeon E3-1220L v3 is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (7.3 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

A10 Micro-6700T makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2014 vs 2013) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 4 threads instead of 2/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

A10 Micro-6700T vs Xeon E3-1220L v3 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A10 Micro-6700T

The A10 Micro-6700T is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 29 April 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Mullins (2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.2 GHz, with boost up to 2.2 GHz. L2 cache: 2048 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FT3. Thermal design power (TDP): 5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1333. Passmark benchmark score: 1,426 points. Launch price was $69.

Xeon E3-1220L v3

The Xeon E3-1220L v3 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Haswell-WS (2013−2014) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.1 GHz, with boost up to 1.5 GHz. L3 cache: 4096 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 13 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 1,407 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The A10 Micro-6700T packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Xeon E3-1220L v3 offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the A10 Micro-6700T has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.2 GHz on the A10 Micro-6700T versus 1.5 GHz on the Xeon E3-1220L v3 — a 37.8% clock advantage for the A10 Micro-6700T (base: 1.2 GHz vs 1.1 GHz). The A10 Micro-6700T uses the Mullins (2014) architecture (28 nm), while the Xeon E3-1220L v3 uses Haswell-WS (2013−2014) (22 nm). In PassMark, the A10 Micro-6700T scores 1,426 against the Xeon E3-1220L v3's 1,407 — a 1.3% lead for the A10 Micro-6700T.

Feature	A10 Micro-6700T	Xeon E3-1220L v3
Cores / Threads	4 / 4+100%	2 / 4
Boost Clock	2.2 GHz+47%	1.5 GHz
Base Clock	1.2 GHz+9%	1.1 GHz
L3 Cache	—	4096 kB (total)
L2 Cache	2048 kB+700%	256 kB (per core)
Process	28 nm	22 nm-21%
Architecture	Mullins (2014)	Haswell-WS (2013−2014)
PassMark	1,426+1%	1,407
Geekbench 6 Single	250	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A10 Micro-6700T uses the FT3 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E3-1220L v3 uses LGA1150 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1333 on the A10 Micro-6700T versus DDR3-1600 on the Xeon E3-1220L v3 — the Xeon E3-1220L v3 supports 20% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon E3-1220L v3 supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB — 300% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 1 (A10 Micro-6700T) vs 2 (Xeon E3-1220L v3). PCIe lanes: 4 (A10 Micro-6700T) vs 16 (Xeon E3-1220L v3) — the Xeon E3-1220L v3 offers 12 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.

Feature	A10 Micro-6700T	Xeon E3-1220L v3
Socket	FT3	LGA1150
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1333	DDR3-1600+20%
Max RAM Capacity	8 GB	32 GB+300%
RAM Channels	1	2+100%
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	4	16+300%

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: AMD-V (A10 Micro-6700T) vs VT-P (Xeon E3-1220L v3). The A10 Micro-6700T includes integrated graphics (Radeon R6), while the Xeon E3-1220L v3 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A10 Micro-6700T targets Tablet. Direct competitor: A10 Micro-6700T rivals Atom Z3770.