CPU
GPU
Mobility Radeon X1450
Popular choices:
RTX A400
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Mobility Radeon X1450 is positioned at rank 730 and the RTX A400 is on rank 26, so the RTX A400 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Mobility Radeon X1450
Performance Per Dollar RTX A400
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The RTX A400 is significantly newer (2024 vs 2010). The RTX A400 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Mobility Radeon X1450 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The RTX A400 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 18030.3% higher G3D Mark score and 3100% more VRAM (4 GB vs 128 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Mobility Radeon X1450.
| Insight | Mobility Radeon X1450 | RTX A400 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-18030.3%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+18030.3%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)) | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ampere (2020−2025) / 8nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+3100%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The RTX A400 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $135 (vs $10), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 1243% better value per dollar than the Mobility Radeon X1450.
| Insight | Mobility Radeon X1450 | RTX A400 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+1243%) |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($10) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($135) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Mobility Radeon X1450 and RTX A400
Mobility Radeon X1450
The Mobility Radeon X1450 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 33 points.
RTX A400
The RTX A400 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 16 2024. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 727 MHz to 1762 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 6 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,983 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Mobility Radeon X1450 scores 33 versus the RTX A400's 5,983 — the RTX A400 leads by 18030.3%. The Mobility Radeon X1450 is built on TeraScale 2 while the RTX A400 uses Ampere, both on 40 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 800 (Mobility Radeon X1450) vs 768 (RTX A400). Raw compute: 1.12 TFLOPS (Mobility Radeon X1450) vs 2.706 TFLOPS (RTX A400).
| Feature | Mobility Radeon X1450 | RTX A400 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 33 | 5,983+18030% |
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Ampere |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 800+4% | 768 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.12 TFLOPS | 2.706 TFLOPS+142% |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| TMUs | 40+67% | 24 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Mobility Radeon X1450 | RTX A400 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Mobility Radeon X1450 comes with 128 MB of VRAM, while the RTX A400 has 4 GB. The RTX A400 offers 3100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | Mobility Radeon X1450 | RTX A400 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.125 GB | 4 GB+3100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
Power & Dimensions
The Mobility Radeon X1450 draws 50W versus the RTX A400's 50W — a 0% difference. The RTX A400 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Mobility Radeon X1450) vs 350W (RTX A400). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Mobility Radeon X1450 | RTX A400 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W | 50W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 0.7 | 119.7+17000% |
Value Analysis
The Mobility Radeon X1450 launched at $100 MSRP and currently averages $10, while the RTX A400 launched at $135 and now averages $135. The Mobility Radeon X1450 costs 92.6% less ($125 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 3.3 (Mobility Radeon X1450) vs 44.3 (RTX A400) — the RTX A400 offers 1242.4% better value. The RTX A400 is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2010).
| Feature | Mobility Radeon X1450 | RTX A400 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $100-26% | $135 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $10-93% | $135 |
| Performance per Dollar | 3.3 | 44.3+1242% |
| Codename | Broadway | GA107 |
| Release | January 7 2010 | April 16 2024 |
| Ranking | #846 | #397 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Mobility Radeon X1450 and RTX A400
