Arc 8-Core iGPU vs GeForce GTX 1650
Arc 8-Core iGPU
Popular choices:
GeForce GTX 1650
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Arc 8-Core iGPU is positioned at rank #417 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Arc 8-Core iGPU
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GTX 1650 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 124.8% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (4 GB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Arc 8-Core iGPU.
| Insight | Arc 8-Core iGPU | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-124.8%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+124.8%) |
| Longevity | Xe LPG (2023) (5nm) | Turing (2018−2022) (12nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GTX 1650 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $75 versus $400 for the Arc 8-Core iGPU, it costs 81% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 1099.1% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Arc 8-Core iGPU | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+1099.1%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($400) | ✅More affordable ($75) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Arc 8-Core iGPU and GeForce GTX 1650
Arc 8-Core iGPU
The Arc 8-Core iGPU is manufactured by Intel. It was released in December 14 2023. It features the Xe LPG architecture. The boost clock speed is 2300 MHz. It has 8 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,500 points.
GeForce GTX 1650
The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Arc 8-Core iGPU scores 3,500 versus the GeForce GTX 1650's 7,869 — the GeForce GTX 1650 leads by 124.8%. The Arc 8-Core iGPU is built on Xe LPG while the GeForce GTX 1650 uses Turing, both on 5 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 8 (Arc 8-Core iGPU) vs 896 (GeForce GTX 1650). Boost clocks: 2300 MHz vs 1665 MHz.
| Feature | Arc 8-Core iGPU | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,500 | 7,869+125% |
| Architecture | Xe LPG | Turing |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 8 | 896+11100% |
| Boost Clock | 2300 MHz+38% | 1665 MHz |
| L1 Cache | 1.5 MB+70% | 0.88 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Arc 8-Core iGPU | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | XeSS | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Arc 8-Core iGPU comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 1650 has 4 GB. The GeForce GTX 1650 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 128-bit.
| Feature | Arc 8-Core iGPU | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | System | 128 GB/s |
| Bus Width | System | 128-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Arc 8-Core iGPU) vs 12 (GeForce GTX 1650). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 3.
| Feature | Arc 8-Core iGPU | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.4+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 3 | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: Xe Media Engine (Arc 8-Core iGPU) vs NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650). Decoder: Xe Media Engine vs NVDEC 4th gen. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1,H.266 (Arc 8-Core iGPU) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650).
| Feature | Arc 8-Core iGPU | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | Xe Media Engine | NVENC 5th gen (Volta) |
| Decoder | Xe Media Engine | NVDEC 4th gen |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1,H.266 | H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Arc 8-Core iGPU draws 45W versus the GeForce GTX 1650's 75W — a 50% difference. The Arc 8-Core iGPU is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Arc 8-Core iGPU) vs 300W (GeForce GTX 1650). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None. Card length: 0mm vs 229mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 70°C.
| Feature | Arc 8-Core iGPU | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 45W-40% | 75W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 300W-14% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | None |
| Length | 0mm | 229mm |
| Height | 0mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 70°C-18% |
| Perf/Watt | 77.8 | 104.9+35% |
Value Analysis
The Arc 8-Core iGPU launched at $503 MSRP and currently averages $400, while the GeForce GTX 1650 launched at $149 and now averages $75. The GeForce GTX 1650 costs 81.3% less ($325 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 8.8 (Arc 8-Core iGPU) vs 104.9 (GeForce GTX 1650) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 1092% better value. The Arc 8-Core iGPU is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2019).
| Feature | Arc 8-Core iGPU | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $503 | $149-70% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $400 | $75-81% |
| Performance per Dollar | 8.8 | 104.9+1092% |
| Codename | Meteor Lake iGPU | TU117 |
| Release | December 14 2023 | April 23 2019 |
| Ranking | #362 | #323 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Arc 8-Core iGPU and GeForce GTX 1650
