Arc A310
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
Arc A310 vs GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Arc A310 vs GeForce RTX 3050 6GB FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Arc A310 vs GeForce RTX 3050 6GB: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Arc A310
2022Why buy it
- ✅Costs $69 less on MSRP ($100 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3050 6GB across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is the safer long-term pick here because the hardware is newer and the feature stack is stronger.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 54.4 vs 63.6 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
2024Why buy it
- ✅72.3% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 17% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 54.4 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅Better long-term bet: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Arc A310 vs GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
Arc A310
The Arc A310 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in October 12 2022. It features the Generation 12.7 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2000 MHz to 2000 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 6 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,438 points.
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 2 2024. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1042 MHz to 1470 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 18 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,749 points. Launch price was $179.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Arc A310 scores 5,438 versus the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB's 10,749 — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB leads by 97.7%. The Arc A310 is built on Generation 12.7 while the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB uses Ampere, both on 6 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 768 (Arc A310) vs 2,304 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB). Raw compute: 3.072 TFLOPS (Arc A310) vs 6.774 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB). Boost clocks: 2000 MHz vs 1470 MHz. Ray tracing: 6 RT cores (Arc A310) vs 18 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) with 96 Tensor cores vs 72.
| Feature | Arc A310 | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,438 | 10,749+98% |
| Architecture | Generation 12.7 | Ampere |
| Process Node | 6 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 768 | 2304+200% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.072 TFLOPS | 6.774 TFLOPS+121% |
| Boost Clock | 2000 MHz+36% | 1470 MHz |
| ROPs | 16 | 32+100% |
| TMUs | 32 | 72+125% |
| L1 Cache | 1.1 MB | 2.3 MB+109% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+100% | 2 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 6 | 18+200% |
| Tensor Cores | 96+33% | 72 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Arc A310 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | Arc A310 | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | DLSS 2 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Arc A310 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB carries 6 GB. GeForce RTX 3050 6GB gives you 50% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 124 GB/s (Arc A310) vs 168 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) — a 35.5% advantage for the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Arc A310 and 96-bit on the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Arc A310) vs 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) — the Arc A310 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Arc A310 | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 6 GB+50% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 124 GB/s | 168 GB/s+35% |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 96-bit+50% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+100% | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (Arc A310) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Arc A310 | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: Xe Media Engine (Arc A310) vs NVENC (5th Gen) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB). Decoder: Xe Media Engine vs NVDEC (7th Gen). Supported codecs: AV1,H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP9 (Arc A310) vs H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB).
| Feature | Arc A310 | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | Xe Media Engine | NVENC (5th Gen) |
| Decoder | Xe Media Engine | NVDEC (7th Gen) |
| Codecs | AV1,H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP9 | H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only) |
Power & Dimensions
The Arc A310 draws 75W versus the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB's 70W — a 6.9% difference. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (Arc A310) vs 300W (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB). Power connectors: None vs None. Card length: 169mm vs 160mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 65°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | Arc A310 | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W | 70W-7% |
| Recommended PSU | 300W | 300W |
| Power Connector | None | None |
| Length | 169mm | 160mm |
| Height | 69mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 65°C-13% | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 72.5 | 153.6+112% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Arc A310 came in at $100, while the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB launched at $169. On MSRP, Arc A310 was 40.8% cheaper ($69 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 54.4 (Arc A310) vs 63.6 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB offers 16.9% better value. The newer card here is GeForce RTX 3050 6GB (2024 vs 2022).
| Feature | Arc A310 | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $100-41% | $169 |
| Performance per Dollar | 54.4 | 63.6+17% |
| Codename | DG2-128 | GA107 |
| Release | October 12 2022 | February 2 2024 |
| Ranking | #422 | #252 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Arc A310 and GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
