
Arc A310

GeForce RTX 3060
Arc A310 vs GeForce RTX 3060 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Arc A310 vs GeForce RTX 3060 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Arc A310 vs GeForce RTX 3060: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Arc A310
2022Why buy it
- ✅Costs $229 less on MSRP ($100 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 170W, a 95W reduction.
- ✅Measures 169mm instead of 242mm, a 73mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3060 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌GeForce RTX 3060 is the safer long-term pick here because the hardware is newer and the feature stack is stronger.
GeForce RTX 3060
2021Why buy it
- ✅186.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅Better long-term bet: Ampere on 8nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌229% HIGHER MSRP$329 MSRPvs$100 MSRP
- ❌126.7% higher power demand at 170W vs 75W.
- ❌43.2% longer card at 242mm vs 169mm.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Arc A310 vs GeForce RTX 3060 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Arc A310
The Arc A310 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in October 12 2022. It features the Generation 12.7 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2000 MHz to 2000 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 6 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,438 points.

GeForce RTX 3060
The GeForce RTX 3060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 12 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1320 MHz to 1777 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 170W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 16,995 points. Launch price was $329.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Arc A310 scores 5,438 versus the GeForce RTX 3060's 16,995 — the GeForce RTX 3060 leads by 212.5%. The Arc A310 is built on Generation 12.7 while the GeForce RTX 3060 uses Ampere, both on 6 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 768 (Arc A310) vs 3,584 (GeForce RTX 3060). Raw compute: 3.072 TFLOPS (Arc A310) vs 12.74 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3060). Boost clocks: 2000 MHz vs 1777 MHz. Ray tracing: 6 RT cores (Arc A310) vs 28 (GeForce RTX 3060) with 96 Tensor cores vs 112.
| Feature | Arc A310 | GeForce RTX 3060 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,438 | 16,995+213% |
| Architecture | Generation 12.7 | Ampere |
| Process Node | 6 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 768 | 3584+367% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.072 TFLOPS | 12.74 TFLOPS+315% |
| Boost Clock | 2000 MHz+13% | 1777 MHz |
| ROPs | 16 | 48+200% |
| TMUs | 32 | 112+250% |
| L1 Cache | 1.1 MB | 3.5 MB+218% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+33% | 3 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 6 | 28+367% |
| Tensor Cores | 96 | 112+17% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3060 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Arc A310 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | Arc A310 | GeForce RTX 3060 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | DLSS 2 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Arc A310 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 3060 carries 12 GB. GeForce RTX 3060 gives you 200% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 124 GB/s (Arc A310) vs 360 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3060) — a 190.3% advantage for the GeForce RTX 3060. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Arc A310 and 192-bit on the GeForce RTX 3060. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Arc A310) vs 3 MB (GeForce RTX 3060) — the Arc A310 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Arc A310 | GeForce RTX 3060 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 12 GB+200% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 124 GB/s | 360 GB/s+190% |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 192-bit+200% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+33% | 3 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (Arc A310) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3060). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Arc A310 | GeForce RTX 3060 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: Xe Media Engine (Arc A310) vs NVENC 7th Gen (GeForce RTX 3060). Decoder: Xe Media Engine vs NVDEC 5th Gen. Supported codecs: AV1,H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP9 (Arc A310) vs AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9 (GeForce RTX 3060).
| Feature | Arc A310 | GeForce RTX 3060 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | Xe Media Engine | NVENC 7th Gen |
| Decoder | Xe Media Engine | NVDEC 5th Gen |
| Codecs | AV1,H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP9 | AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Arc A310 draws 75W versus the GeForce RTX 3060's 170W — a 77.6% difference. The Arc A310 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (Arc A310) vs 550W (GeForce RTX 3060). Power connectors: None vs 8-pin. Card length: 169mm vs 242mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 65°C vs 75.
| Feature | Arc A310 | GeForce RTX 3060 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W-56% | 170W |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-45% | 550W |
| Power Connector | None | 8-pin |
| Length | 169mm | 242mm |
| Height | 69mm | 112mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 65°C-13% | 75 |
| Perf/Watt | 72.5 | 100.0+38% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Arc A310 came in at $100, while the GeForce RTX 3060 launched at $329. On MSRP, Arc A310 was 69.6% cheaper ($229 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 54.4 (Arc A310) vs 51.7 (GeForce RTX 3060) — the Arc A310 offers 5.2% better value. The newer card here is Arc A310 (2022 vs 2021).
| Feature | Arc A310 | GeForce RTX 3060 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $100-70% | $329 |
| Performance per Dollar | 54.4+5% | 51.7 |
| Codename | DG2-128 | GA106 |
| Release | October 12 2022 | January 12 2021 |
| Ranking | #422 | #114 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















