
Arc A310

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
Arc A310 vs GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Arc A310 vs GeForce RTX 4060 Ti FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Arc A310 vs GeForce RTX 4060 Ti: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Arc A310
2022Why buy it
- ✅Costs $299 less on MSRP ($100 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 160W, a 85W reduction.
- ✅Measures 169mm instead of 240mm, a 71mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4060 Ti across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the safer long-term pick here because the hardware is newer and the feature stack is stronger.
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
2023Why buy it
- ✅262.7% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅Better long-term bet: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌113.3% higher power demand at 160W vs 75W.
- ❌42% longer card at 240mm vs 169mm.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Arc A310 vs GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Arc A310
The Arc A310 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in October 12 2022. It features the Generation 12.7 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2000 MHz to 2000 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 6 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,438 points.

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2535 MHz. It has 4352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 34 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,651 points. Launch price was $399.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Arc A310 scores 5,438 versus the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti's 22,651 — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti leads by 316.5%. The Arc A310 is built on Generation 12.7 while the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti uses Ada Lovelace, both on 6 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 768 (Arc A310) vs 4,352 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti). Raw compute: 3.072 TFLOPS (Arc A310) vs 22.06 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti). Boost clocks: 2000 MHz vs 2535 MHz. Ray tracing: 6 RT cores (Arc A310) vs 34 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) with 96 Tensor cores vs 136.
| Feature | Arc A310 | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,438 | 22,651+317% |
| Architecture | Generation 12.7 | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 6 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 768 | 4352+467% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.072 TFLOPS | 22.06 TFLOPS+618% |
| Boost Clock | 2000 MHz | 2535 MHz+27% |
| ROPs | 16 | 48+200% |
| TMUs | 32 | 136+325% |
| L1 Cache | 1.1 MB | 4.3 MB+291% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 32 MB+700% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 6 | 34+467% |
| Tensor Cores | 96 | 136+42% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The clearest feature edge for the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The Arc A310 does not have comparable native support in the same tier.The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Arc A310 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | Arc A310 | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | Yes (DLSS 3.5) |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Arc A310 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti carries 8 GB. GeForce RTX 4060 Ti gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 124 GB/s (Arc A310) vs 288 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) — a 132.3% advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Arc A310 and 128-bit on the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Arc A310) vs 32 MB (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Arc A310 | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 8 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 124 GB/s | 288 GB/s+132% |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 32 MB+700% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (Arc A310) vs 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Arc A310 | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: Xe Media Engine (Arc A310) vs 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti). Decoder: Xe Media Engine vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: AV1,H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP9 (Arc A310) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti).
| Feature | Arc A310 | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | Xe Media Engine | 8th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | Xe Media Engine | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | AV1,H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Arc A310 draws 75W versus the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti's 160W — a 72.3% difference. The Arc A310 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (Arc A310) vs 550W (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti). Power connectors: None vs 8-pin. Card length: 169mm vs 240mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 65°C vs 70°C.
| Feature | Arc A310 | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W-53% | 160W |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-45% | 550W |
| Power Connector | None | 8-pin |
| Length | 169mm | 240mm |
| Height | 69mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 65°C-7% | 70°C |
| Perf/Watt | 72.5 | 141.6+95% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Arc A310 came in at $100, while the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti launched at $399. On MSRP, Arc A310 was 74.9% cheaper ($299 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 54.4 (Arc A310) vs 56.8 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti offers 4.4% better value. The newer card here is GeForce RTX 4060 Ti (2023 vs 2022).
| Feature | Arc A310 | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $100-75% | $399 |
| Performance per Dollar | 54.4 | 56.8+4% |
| Codename | DG2-128 | AD106 |
| Release | October 12 2022 | May 18 2023 |
| Ranking | #422 | #59 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















