
Arc A310

GeForce RTX 4070
Arc A310 vs GeForce RTX 4070 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Arc A310 vs GeForce RTX 4070 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Arc A310 vs GeForce RTX 4070: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Arc A310
2022Why buy it
- ✅Costs $499 less on MSRP ($100 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 21% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 54.4 vs 44.9 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 200W, a 125W reduction.
- ✅Measures 169mm instead of 304mm, a 135mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4070 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌GeForce RTX 4070 is the safer long-term pick here because the hardware is newer and the feature stack is stronger.
GeForce RTX 4070
2023Why buy it
- ✅275.3% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅Better long-term bet: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌499% HIGHER MSRP$599 MSRPvs$100 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 44.9 vs 54.4 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
- ❌166.7% higher power demand at 200W vs 75W.
- ❌79.9% longer card at 304mm vs 169mm.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Arc A310 vs GeForce RTX 4070 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Arc A310
The Arc A310 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in October 12 2022. It features the Generation 12.7 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2000 MHz to 2000 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 6 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,438 points.

GeForce RTX 4070
The GeForce RTX 4070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1920 MHz to 2475 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 26,919 points. Launch price was $599.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Arc A310 scores 5,438 versus the GeForce RTX 4070's 26,919 — the GeForce RTX 4070 leads by 395%. The Arc A310 is built on Generation 12.7 while the GeForce RTX 4070 uses Ada Lovelace, both on 6 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 768 (Arc A310) vs 5,888 (GeForce RTX 4070). Raw compute: 3.072 TFLOPS (Arc A310) vs 29.15 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070). Boost clocks: 2000 MHz vs 2475 MHz. Ray tracing: 6 RT cores (Arc A310) vs 46 (GeForce RTX 4070) with 96 Tensor cores vs 184.
| Feature | Arc A310 | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,438 | 26,919+395% |
| Architecture | Generation 12.7 | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 6 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 768 | 5888+667% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.072 TFLOPS | 29.15 TFLOPS+849% |
| Boost Clock | 2000 MHz | 2475 MHz+24% |
| ROPs | 16 | 64+300% |
| TMUs | 32 | 184+475% |
| L1 Cache | 1.1 MB | 5.8 MB+427% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 36 MB+800% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 6 | 46+667% |
| Tensor Cores | 96 | 184+92% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The clearest feature edge for the GeForce RTX 4070 is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The Arc A310 does not have comparable native support in the same tier.The GeForce RTX 4070 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Arc A310 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | Arc A310 | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | Yes (DLSS 3.5) |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Arc A310 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 4070 carries 12 GB. GeForce RTX 4070 gives you 200% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 124 GB/s (Arc A310) vs 504 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4070) — a 306.5% advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Arc A310 and 192-bit on the GeForce RTX 4070. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Arc A310) vs 36 MB (GeForce RTX 4070) — the GeForce RTX 4070 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Arc A310 | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 12 GB+200% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6X |
| Memory Bandwidth | 124 GB/s | 504 GB/s+306% |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 192-bit+200% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 36 MB+800% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (Arc A310) vs 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4070). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Arc A310 | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: Xe Media Engine (Arc A310) vs 8th Gen NVENC (2x) (GeForce RTX 4070). Decoder: Xe Media Engine vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: AV1,H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP9 (Arc A310) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4070).
| Feature | Arc A310 | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | Xe Media Engine | 8th Gen NVENC (2x) |
| Decoder | Xe Media Engine | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | AV1,H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Arc A310 draws 75W versus the GeForce RTX 4070's 200W — a 90.9% difference. The Arc A310 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (Arc A310) vs 650W (GeForce RTX 4070). Power connectors: None vs 8-pin. Card length: 169mm vs 304mm, occupying 2 vs 3 slots. Typical load temperature: 65°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | Arc A310 | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W-63% | 200W |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-54% | 650W |
| Power Connector | None | 8-pin |
| Length | 169mm | 304mm |
| Height | 69mm | 137mm |
| Slots | 2-33% | 3 |
| Temp (Load) | 65°C-19% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 72.5 | 134.6+86% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Arc A310 came in at $100, while the GeForce RTX 4070 launched at $599. On MSRP, Arc A310 was 83.3% cheaper ($499 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 54.4 (Arc A310) vs 44.9 (GeForce RTX 4070) — the Arc A310 offers 21.2% better value. The newer card here is GeForce RTX 4070 (2023 vs 2022).
| Feature | Arc A310 | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $100-83% | $599 |
| Performance per Dollar | 54.4+21% | 44.9 |
| Codename | DG2-128 | AD104 |
| Release | October 12 2022 | April 12 2023 |
| Ranking | #422 | #32 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















