Arc A370M vs GeForce RTX 2060

Intel

Arc A370M

2022Core: 300 MHzBoost: 1550 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 2060

2019Core: 1365 MHzBoost: 1680 MHz
RTX family
·······

Arc A370M vs GeForce RTX 2060 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Arc A370M vs GeForce RTX 2060 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Arc A370M vs GeForce RTX 2060: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Arc A370M

2022

Why buy it

  • Draws 35W instead of 160W, a 125W reduction.
  • More future proof: Generation 12.7 (2022−2023) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 2060 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 40.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $349 MSRP).

GeForce RTX 2060

2019

Why buy it

  • 95.6% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($349 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
  • 50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).

Trade-offs

  • 357.1% higher power demand at 160W vs 35W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce RTX 2060 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 95.6% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 175.9% in PassMark G3D (14,114 vs 5,115), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Arc A370M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 6nm process instead of 12nm and a newer 2022 generation instead of 2019. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce RTX 2060 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and lighter 1440p, GeForce RTX 2060 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Arc A370M has the stronger long-term case.

Arc A370M vs GeForce RTX 2060 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Arc A370M

The Arc A370M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in March 30 2022. It features the Generation 12.7 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1550 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 8 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,115 points.

NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 2060

The GeForce RTX 2060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 7 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1365 MHz to 1680 MHz. It has 1920 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 30 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,114 points. Launch price was $349.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the Arc A370M scores 5,115 versus the GeForce RTX 2060's 14,114 — the GeForce RTX 2060 leads by 175.9%. The Arc A370M is built on Generation 12.7 while the GeForce RTX 2060 uses Turing, both on 6 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 1,024 (Arc A370M) vs 1,920 (GeForce RTX 2060). Raw compute: 3.174 TFLOPS (Arc A370M) vs 6.451 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 2060). Boost clocks: 1550 MHz vs 1680 MHz. Ray tracing: 8 RT cores (Arc A370M) vs 30 (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 240.

FeatureArc A370MGeForce RTX 2060
G3D Mark Score
5,115
14,114+176%
Architecture
Generation 12.7
Turing
Process Node
6 nm
12 nm
Shading Units
1024
1920+88%
Compute (TFLOPS)
3.174 TFLOPS
6.451 TFLOPS+103%
Boost Clock
1550 MHz
1680 MHz+8%
ROPs
32
48+50%
TMUs
64
120+88%
L1 Cache
1.5 MB
1.9 MB+27%
L2 Cache
4 MB+33%
3 MB
Ray Tracing Cores
8
30+275%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce RTX 2060 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Arc A370M leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureArc A370MGeForce RTX 2060
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
DLSS 2 Super Resolution
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
NVIDIA Reflex
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Arc A370M has 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 2060 carries 6 GB. GeForce RTX 2060 gives you 50% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 112 GB/s (Arc A370M) vs 336 GB/s (GeForce RTX 2060) — a 200% advantage for the GeForce RTX 2060. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Arc A370M and 192-bit on the GeForce RTX 2060. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Arc A370M) vs 3 MB (GeForce RTX 2060) — the Arc A370M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureArc A370MGeForce RTX 2060
VRAM Capacity
4 GB
6 GB+50%
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth
112 GB/s
336 GB/s+200%
Bus Width
64-bit
192-bit+200%
L2 Cache
4 MB+33%
3 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (Arc A370M) vs 12 Ultimate (12_2) (GeForce RTX 2060). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

FeatureArc A370MGeForce RTX 2060
DirectX
12 Ultimate
12 Ultimate (12_2)
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
4
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: Xe Media Engine (Arc A370M) vs NVENC (Turing) (GeForce RTX 2060). Decoder: Xe Media Engine vs NVDEC (Turing). Supported codecs: AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9 (Arc A370M) vs H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce RTX 2060).

FeatureArc A370MGeForce RTX 2060
Encoder
Xe Media Engine
NVENC (Turing)
Decoder
Xe Media Engine
NVDEC (Turing)
Codecs
AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9
H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2,VC-1
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Arc A370M draws 35W versus the GeForce RTX 2060's 160W — a 128.2% difference. The Arc A370M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Arc A370M) vs 500W (GeForce RTX 2060). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 8-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 229mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 90 vs 72.

FeatureArc A370MGeForce RTX 2060
TDP
35W-78%
160W
Recommended PSU
350W-30%
500W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
8-pin
Length
0mm
229mm
Height
0mm
113mm
Slots
0-100%
2
Temp (Load)
90
72-20%
Perf/Watt
146.1+66%
88.2
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Arc A370M (2022 vs 2019).

FeatureArc A370MGeForce RTX 2060
MSRP
$349
Codename
DG2-128
TU106
Release
March 30 2022
January 7 2019
Ranking
#439
#168

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.