Arc A370M vs GeForce RTX 3070
Arc A370M
Popular choices:
GeForce RTX 3070
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Arc A370M is positioned at rank #211 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Arc A370M
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 3070
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 3070 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 333.5% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (8 GB vs 4 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Arc A370M.
| Insight | Arc A370M | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-333.5%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+333.5%) |
| Longevity | Generation 12.7 (2022−2023) (6nm) | 🔮Strong Longevity (Ampere (2020−2025) / 8nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | ✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce RTX 3070 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Arc A370M and GeForce RTX 3070
Arc A370M
The Arc A370M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in March 30 2022. It features the Generation 12.7 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1550 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 8 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,115 points.
GeForce RTX 3070
The GeForce RTX 3070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 1725 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 220W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,172 points. Launch price was $499.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Arc A370M scores 5,115 versus the GeForce RTX 3070's 22,172 — the GeForce RTX 3070 leads by 333.5%. The Arc A370M is built on Generation 12.7 while the GeForce RTX 3070 uses Ampere, both on 6 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 1,024 (Arc A370M) vs 5,888 (GeForce RTX 3070). Raw compute: 3.174 TFLOPS (Arc A370M) vs 20.31 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3070). Boost clocks: 1550 MHz vs 1725 MHz. Ray tracing: 8 RT cores (Arc A370M) vs 46 (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 184.
| Feature | Arc A370M | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,115 | 22,172+333% |
| Architecture | Generation 12.7 | Ampere |
| Process Node | 6 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 1024 | 5888+475% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.174 TFLOPS | 20.31 TFLOPS+540% |
| Boost Clock | 1550 MHz | 1725 MHz+11% |
| ROPs | 32 | 96+200% |
| TMUs | 64 | 184+188% |
| L1 Cache | 1.5 MB | 5.8 MB+287% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 4 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 8 | 46+475% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Arc A370M | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | XeSS | DLSS 2.0 |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Arc A370M comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 3070 has 8 GB. The GeForce RTX 3070 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 112 GB/s (Arc A370M) vs 448 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3070) — a 300% advantage for the GeForce RTX 3070. Bus width: 64-bit vs 256-bit.
| Feature | Arc A370M | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 8 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 112 GB/s | 448 GB/s+300% |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 256-bit+300% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 4 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (Arc A370M) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3070). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Arc A370M | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.4+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: Xe Media Engine (Arc A370M) vs NVENC 7th gen (GeForce RTX 3070). Decoder: Xe Media Engine vs NVDEC 5th gen. Supported codecs: AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9 (Arc A370M) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 (GeForce RTX 3070).
| Feature | Arc A370M | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | Xe Media Engine | NVENC 7th gen |
| Decoder | Xe Media Engine | NVDEC 5th gen |
| Codecs | AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9 | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Arc A370M draws 35W versus the GeForce RTX 3070's 220W — a 145.1% difference. The Arc A370M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Arc A370M) vs 650W (GeForce RTX 3070). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 8-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 242mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 90 vs 75°C.
| Feature | Arc A370M | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 35W-84% | 220W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-46% | 650W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 8-pin |
| Length | 0mm | 242mm |
| Height | 0mm | 112mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 90 | 75°C-17% |
| Perf/Watt | 146.1+45% | 100.8 |
Value Analysis
The Arc A370M is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2020).
| Feature | Arc A370M | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $499 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $200 |
| Codename | DG2-128 | GA104 |
| Release | March 30 2022 | September 1 2020 |
| Ranking | #439 | #63 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Arc A370M and GeForce RTX 3070
