Arc A770M
VS
GeForce GTX 1650

Arc A770M vs GeForce GTX 1650

Intel

Arc A770M

2022Core: 1650 MHzBoost: 2050 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1650

2019Core: 1485 MHzBoost: 1665 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Arc A770M

#22
Radeon RX 7700
MSRP: $449|Avg: $399
133%
#25
Radeon RX 7600M XT
MSRP: $329|Avg: $300
120%
#28
Radeon RX 6650M XT
MSRP: $400|Avg: $400
115%
#30
Radeon 8050S
MSRP: $400|Avg: $400
110%
#31
Radeon RX 8050S
MSRP: $400|Avg: $400
109%
#35
Arc A770M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#39
Radeon RX 7700S
MSRP: $449|Avg: $350
93%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Arc A770M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 50.6% higher G3D Mark score and 300% more VRAM (16 GB vs 4 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 1650.

InsightArc A770MGeForce GTX 1650
Performance
Leading raw performance (+50.6%)
Lower raw frame rates (-50.6%)
Longevity
🔮Strong Longevity (Generation 12.7 (2022−2023) / 6nm)
Turing (2018−2022) (12nm)
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
🎮 High Capacity (16 GB)
❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency
Normal Efficiency
Normal Efficiency
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the Arc A770M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Arc A770M and GeForce GTX 1650

Intel

Arc A770M

The Arc A770M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2022. It features the Generation 12.7 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1650 MHz to 2050 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 120W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 32 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,853 points.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1650

The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the Arc A770M scores 11,853 versus the GeForce GTX 1650's 7,869 — the Arc A770M leads by 50.6%. The Arc A770M is built on Generation 12.7 while the GeForce GTX 1650 uses Turing, both on 6 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 4,096 (Arc A770M) vs 896 (GeForce GTX 1650). Raw compute: 16.79 TFLOPS (Arc A770M) vs 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650). Boost clocks: 2050 MHz vs 1665 MHz.

FeatureArc A770MGeForce GTX 1650
G3D Mark Score
11,853+51%
7,869
Architecture
Generation 12.7
Turing
Process Node
6 nm
12 nm
Shading Units
4096+357%
896
Compute (TFLOPS)
16.79 TFLOPS+463%
2.984 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
2050 MHz+23%
1665 MHz
ROPs
128+300%
32
TMUs
256+357%
56
L1 Cache
6 MB+582%
0.88 MB
L2 Cache
16 MB+1500%
1 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureArc A770MGeForce GTX 1650
Upscaling Tech
XeSS
FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
Frame Generation
FSR 3 (Compatible)
FSR 3 (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Arc A770M comes with 16 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 1650 has 4 GB. The Arc A770M offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 512 GB/s (Arc A770M) vs 128 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1650) — a 300% advantage for the Arc A770M. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 16 MB (Arc A770M) vs 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) — the Arc A770M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureArc A770MGeForce GTX 1650
VRAM Capacity
16 GB+300%
4 GB
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
512 GB/s+300%
128 GB/s
Bus Width
256-bit+100%
128-bit
L2 Cache
16 MB+1500%
1 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.2 (Arc A770M) vs 12 (GeForce GTX 1650). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.

FeatureArc A770MGeForce GTX 1650
DirectX
12.2+2%
12
Vulkan
1.3
1.4+8%
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
4+33%
3
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: Xe Media Engine (Arc A770M) vs NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650). Decoder: Xe Media Engine vs NVDEC 4th gen. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (Arc A770M) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650).

FeatureArc A770MGeForce GTX 1650
Encoder
Xe Media Engine
NVENC 5th gen (Volta)
Decoder
Xe Media Engine
NVDEC 4th gen
Codecs
H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1
H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Arc A770M draws 120W versus the GeForce GTX 1650's 75W — a 46.2% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Arc A770M) vs 300W (GeForce GTX 1650). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None. Card length: 0mm vs 229mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 70°C.

FeatureArc A770MGeForce GTX 1650
TDP
120W
75W-38%
Recommended PSU
500W
300W-40%
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
None
Length
0mm
229mm
Height
0mm
111mm
Slots
0-100%
2
Temp (Load)
80°C
70°C-13%
Perf/Watt
98.8
104.9+6%
💰

Value Analysis

The Arc A770M is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2019).

FeatureArc A770MGeForce GTX 1650
MSRP
$149
Avg Price (30d)
$75
Codename
DG2-512
TU117
Release
2022
April 23 2019
Ranking
#225
#323