Arc A770M vs GeForce RTX 3050 6GB

Intel

Arc A770M

2022Core: 1650 MHzBoost: 2050 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB

2024Core: 1042 MHzBoost: 1470 MHz

Arc A770M vs GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Arc A770M vs GeForce RTX 3050 6GB FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Arc A770M vs GeForce RTX 3050 6GB: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Arc A770M

2022

Why buy it

  • 93.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 166.7% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 6 GB).
  • More future proof: Generation 12.7 (2022−2023) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
  • GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is the safer long-term pick here because the hardware is newer and the feature stack is stronger.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 63.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
  • 71.4% higher power demand at 120W vs 70W.

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB

2024

Why buy it

  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
  • Better long-term bet: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
  • Draws 70W instead of 120W, a 50W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Arc A770M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Arc A770M is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 93.9% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 10.3% in PassMark G3D (11,853 vs 10,749), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: the newer upscaling stack, DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack and a newer 2024 generation instead of 2022. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. Arc A770M still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

Arc A770M vs GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Arc A770M

The Arc A770M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2022. It features the Generation 12.7 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1650 MHz to 2050 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 120W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 32 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,853 points.

NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB

The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 2 2024. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1042 MHz to 1470 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 18 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,749 points. Launch price was $179.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the Arc A770M scores 11,853 versus the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB's 10,749 — the Arc A770M leads by 10.3%. The Arc A770M is built on Generation 12.7 while the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB uses Ampere, both on 6 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 4,096 (Arc A770M) vs 2,304 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB). Raw compute: 16.79 TFLOPS (Arc A770M) vs 6.774 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB). Boost clocks: 2050 MHz vs 1470 MHz. Ray tracing: 32 RT cores (Arc A770M) vs 18 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) with 512 Tensor cores vs 72.

FeatureArc A770MGeForce RTX 3050 6GB
G3D Mark Score
11,853+10%
10,749
Architecture
Generation 12.7
Ampere
Process Node
6 nm
8 nm
Shading Units
4096+78%
2304
Compute (TFLOPS)
16.79 TFLOPS+148%
6.774 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
2050 MHz+39%
1470 MHz
ROPs
128+300%
32
TMUs
256+256%
72
L1 Cache
6 MB+161%
2.3 MB
L2 Cache
16 MB+700%
2 MB
Ray Tracing Cores
32+78%
18
Tensor Cores
512+611%
72

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Arc A770M leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureArc A770MGeForce RTX 3050 6GB
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
DLSS 2 Super Resolution
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
NVIDIA Reflex
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Arc A770M has 16 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB carries 6 GB. Arc A770M gives you 166.7% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 512 GB/s (Arc A770M) vs 168 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) — a 204.8% advantage for the Arc A770M. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the Arc A770M and 96-bit on the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB. L2 Cache: 16 MB (Arc A770M) vs 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) — the Arc A770M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureArc A770MGeForce RTX 3050 6GB
VRAM Capacity
16 GB+167%
6 GB
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth
512 GB/s+205%
168 GB/s
Bus Width
256-bit+167%
96-bit
L2 Cache
16 MB+700%
2 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.2 (Arc A770M) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

FeatureArc A770MGeForce RTX 3050 6GB
DirectX
12.2+2%
12 Ultimate
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
4
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: Xe Media Engine (Arc A770M) vs NVENC (5th Gen) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB). Decoder: Xe Media Engine vs NVDEC (7th Gen). Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (Arc A770M) vs H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB).

FeatureArc A770MGeForce RTX 3050 6GB
Encoder
Xe Media Engine
NVENC (5th Gen)
Decoder
Xe Media Engine
NVDEC (7th Gen)
Codecs
H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1
H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only)
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Arc A770M draws 120W versus the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB's 70W — a 52.6% difference. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Arc A770M) vs 300W (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None. Card length: 0mm vs 160mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 75°C.

FeatureArc A770MGeForce RTX 3050 6GB
TDP
120W
70W-42%
Recommended PSU
500W
300W-40%
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
None
Length
0mm
160mm
Height
0mm
Slots
0-100%
2
Temp (Load)
80°C
75°C-6%
Perf/Watt
98.8
153.6+55%
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is GeForce RTX 3050 6GB (2024 vs 2022).

FeatureArc A770MGeForce RTX 3050 6GB
MSRP
$169
Codename
DG2-512
GA107
Release
2022
February 2 2024
Ranking
#225
#252

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.