Athlon 64 FX-74 vs A4-7210
Athlon 64 FX-74
A4-7210
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Athlon 64 FX-74 is positioned at rank 1087 and the A4-7210 is on rank 737, so the A4-7210 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Athlon 64 FX-74
Performance Per Dollar A4-7210
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Athlon 64 FX-74 | A4-7210 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($50) | ✅ More affordable ($0) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Windsor (2006−2007) / 90 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Carrizo-L (2015) / 28 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Athlon 64 FX-74 | A4-7210 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($50) | ✅ More affordable ($0) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Athlon 64 FX-74 and A4-7210
Athlon 64 FX-74
The Athlon 64 FX-74 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Novembro 2006 (19 years ago). It is based on the Windsor (2006−2007) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 3 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 90 nm process technology. Socket: F. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR1. Passmark benchmark score: 1,658 points. Launch price was $500.
A4-7210
The A4-7210 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Carrizo-L (2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.2 GHz. L2 cache: 2048 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FT3. Thermal design power (TDP): 2 MB. Memory support: DDR3L-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 1,670 points. Launch price was $50.
Processing Power
The Athlon 64 FX-74 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the A4-7210 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the A4-7210 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3 GHz on the Athlon 64 FX-74 versus 2.2 GHz on the A4-7210 — a 30.8% clock advantage for the Athlon 64 FX-74. The Athlon 64 FX-74 uses the Windsor (2006−2007) architecture (90 nm), while the A4-7210 uses Carrizo-L (2015) (28 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon 64 FX-74 scores 1,658 against the A4-7210's 1,670 — a 0.7% lead for the A4-7210. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 400 vs 208, a 63.2% lead for the Athlon 64 FX-74 that directly translates to higher frame rates.
| Feature | Athlon 64 FX-74 | A4-7210 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 4 / 4+100% |
| Boost Clock | 3 GHz+36% | 2.2 GHz |
| Base Clock | — | 1.8 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | — |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 2048 kB+100% |
| Process | 90 nm | 28 nm-69% |
| Architecture | Windsor (2006−2007) | Carrizo-L (2015) |
| PassMark | 1,658 | 1,670 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 400+92% | 208 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 750 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Athlon 64 FX-74 uses the F socket (PCIe 1.1), while the A4-7210 uses FT3 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR2 on the Athlon 64 FX-74 versus DDR3L-1600 on the A4-7210 — the A4-7210 supports 40% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 16 GB of RAM. Memory channels: 2 (Athlon 64 FX-74) vs 1 (A4-7210). PCIe lanes: 16 (Athlon 64 FX-74) vs 8 (A4-7210) — the Athlon 64 FX-74 offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.
| Feature | Athlon 64 FX-74 | A4-7210 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | F | FT3 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 1.1 | PCIe 3.0+173% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR2 | DDR3L-1600+50% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2+100% | 1 |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 16+100% | 8 |
Advanced Features
Only the Athlon 64 FX-74 has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support AMD-V virtualization. The A4-7210 includes integrated graphics (Radeon R3), while the Athlon 64 FX-74 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Athlon 64 FX-74 targets Budget, A4-7210 targets Entry Laptop. Direct competitor: Athlon 64 FX-74 rivals Pentium Extreme Edition 965; A4-7210 rivals Pentium N3710.
| Feature | Athlon 64 FX-74 | A4-7210 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | Radeon R3 |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | AMD-V |
| Target Use | Budget | Entry Laptop |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Athlon 64 FX-74 and A4-7210
