
Athlon 64 FX-74 vs Core i5-13400F

Athlon 64 FX-74

Core i5-13400F
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. The Athlon 64 FX-74 is positioned at rank #1087 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Athlon 64 FX-74
Performance Per Dollar Core i5-13400F
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Athlon 64 FX-74 | Core i5-13400F |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($50) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($180) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Windsor (2006−2007) / 90 nm) | ✨ Modern (Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) / Intel 7 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Athlon 64 FX-74 | Core i5-13400F |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+319%) |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($50) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($180) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Athlon 64 FX-74 and Core i5-13400F

Athlon 64 FX-74
The Athlon 64 FX-74 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Novembro 2006 (19 years ago). It is based on the Windsor (2006−2007) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 3 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 90 nm process technology. Socket: F. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR1. Passmark benchmark score: 1,658 points. Launch price was $500.

Core i5-13400F
The Core i5-13400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 25,029 points. Launch price was $196.
Processing Power
The Athlon 64 FX-74 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Core i5-13400F offers 10 cores / 16 threads — the Core i5-13400F has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3 GHz on the Athlon 64 FX-74 versus 4.6 GHz on the Core i5-13400F — a 42.1% clock advantage for the Core i5-13400F. The Athlon 64 FX-74 uses the Windsor (2006−2007) architecture (90 nm), while the Core i5-13400F uses Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon 64 FX-74 scores 1,658 against the Core i5-13400F's 25,029 — a 175.1% lead for the Core i5-13400F. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 400 vs 2,407, a 143% lead for the Core i5-13400F that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 750 vs 11,408 (175.3% advantage for the Core i5-13400F). L3 cache: 0 kB on the Athlon 64 FX-74 vs 20 MB (total) on the Core i5-13400F.
| Feature | Athlon 64 FX-74 | Core i5-13400F |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 10 / 16+400% |
| Boost Clock | 3 GHz | 4.6 GHz+53% |
| Base Clock | — | 2.5 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 20 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 1.25 MB (per core)+25% |
| Process | 90 nm | Intel 7 nm-92% |
| Architecture | Windsor (2006−2007) | Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) |
| PassMark | 1,658 | 25,029+1410% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 16,211 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 400 | 2,407+502% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 750 | 11,408+1421% |
Memory & Platform
The Athlon 64 FX-74 uses the F socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Core i5-13400F uses LGA1700 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR2 on the Athlon 64 FX-74 versus DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 on the Core i5-13400F — the Core i5-13400F supports 85.7% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i5-13400F supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB — 169.2% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Athlon 64 FX-74) vs 20 (Core i5-13400F) — the Core i5-13400F offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: nForce 680a (Athlon 64 FX-74) and H610,B660,H670,Z690,B760,H770,Z790 (Core i5-13400F).
| Feature | Athlon 64 FX-74 | Core i5-13400F |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | F | LGA1700 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 1.1 | PCIe 5.0+355% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR2 | DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200+150% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 16 GB | 192 GB+1100% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 20+25% |
Advanced Features
Only the Athlon 64 FX-74 has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: AMD-V (Athlon 64 FX-74) vs VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-13400F). Primary use case: Athlon 64 FX-74 targets Budget, Core i5-13400F targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Athlon 64 FX-74 rivals Pentium Extreme Edition 965; Core i5-13400F rivals Ryzen 5 7600.
| Feature | Athlon 64 FX-74 | Core i5-13400F |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | Budget | Gaming |
Value Analysis
The Athlon 64 FX-74 launched at $499 MSRP, while the Core i5-13400F debuted at $196. At current prices ($50 vs $180), the Athlon 64 FX-74 is $130 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon 64 FX-74 delivers 33.2 pts/$ vs 139.1 pts/$ for the Core i5-13400F — making the Core i5-13400F the 123% better value option.
| Feature | Athlon 64 FX-74 | Core i5-13400F |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $499 | $196-61% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $50-72% | $180 |
| Performance per Dollar | 33.2 | 139.1+319% |
| Release Date | 2006 | 2023 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
















