Athlon 64 FX-74 vs A6-5200
Athlon 64 FX-74
A6-5200
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Athlon 64 FX-74 is positioned at rank 1087 and the A6-5200 is on rank 736, so the A6-5200 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Athlon 64 FX-74
Performance Per Dollar A6-5200
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Athlon 64 FX-74 | A6-5200 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($50) | ✅ More affordable ($0) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Windsor (2006−2007) / 90 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Kabini (2013−2014) / 28 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Athlon 64 FX-74 | A6-5200 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($50) | ✅ More affordable ($0) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Athlon 64 FX-74 and A6-5200
Athlon 64 FX-74
The Athlon 64 FX-74 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Novembro 2006 (19 years ago). It is based on the Windsor (2006−2007) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 3 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 90 nm process technology. Socket: F. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR1. Passmark benchmark score: 1,658 points. Launch price was $500.
A6-5200
The A6-5200 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Kabini (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Max frequency: 2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2048 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FT3. Thermal design power (TDP): 25 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 1,672 points. Launch price was $70.
Processing Power
The Athlon 64 FX-74 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the A6-5200 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the A6-5200 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3 GHz on the Athlon 64 FX-74 versus 2 GHz on the A6-5200 — a 40% clock advantage for the Athlon 64 FX-74. The Athlon 64 FX-74 uses the Windsor (2006−2007) architecture (90 nm), while the A6-5200 uses Kabini (2013−2014) (28 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon 64 FX-74 scores 1,658 against the A6-5200's 1,672 — a 0.8% lead for the A6-5200. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 400 vs 215, a 60.2% lead for the Athlon 64 FX-74 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.
| Feature | Athlon 64 FX-74 | A6-5200 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 4 / 4+100% |
| Boost Clock | 3 GHz+50% | 2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 0 kB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 2048 kB+100% |
| Process | 90 nm | 28 nm-69% |
| Architecture | Windsor (2006−2007) | Kabini (2013−2014) |
| PassMark | 1,658 | 1,672 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 400+86% | 215 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 750 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Athlon 64 FX-74 uses the F socket (PCIe 1.1), while the A6-5200 uses FT3 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR2 on the Athlon 64 FX-74 versus DDR3-1600 on the A6-5200 — the A6-5200 supports 40% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Athlon 64 FX-74 supports up to 16 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Athlon 64 FX-74) vs 1 (A6-5200). PCIe lanes: 16 (Athlon 64 FX-74) vs 8 (A6-5200) — the Athlon 64 FX-74 offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.
| Feature | Athlon 64 FX-74 | A6-5200 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | F | FT3 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 1.1 | PCIe 2.0+82% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR2 | DDR3-1600+50% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 16 GB+100% | 8 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2+100% | 1 |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 16+100% | 8 |
Advanced Features
Only the Athlon 64 FX-74 has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support AMD-V virtualization. The A6-5200 includes integrated graphics (Radeon HD 8400), while the Athlon 64 FX-74 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Athlon 64 FX-74 targets Budget, A6-5200 targets Entry Laptop. Direct competitor: Athlon 64 FX-74 rivals Pentium Extreme Edition 965; A6-5200 rivals Pentium N3510.
| Feature | Athlon 64 FX-74 | A6-5200 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | Radeon HD 8400 |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | AMD-V |
| Target Use | Budget | Entry Laptop |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Athlon 64 FX-74 and A6-5200
