CPU
GPU
Athlon 64 X2 6000+
Core 2 Duo T7100
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Athlon 64 X2 6000+ is positioned at rank 1077 and the Core 2 Duo T7100 is on rank 24, so the Core 2 Duo T7100 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Athlon 64 X2 6000+
Performance Per Dollar Core 2 Duo T7100
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Athlon 64 X2 6000+ | Core 2 Duo T7100 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($20) | ✅ More affordable ($15) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Windsor (2006−2007) / 90 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Merom (2006−2008) / 65 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Athlon 64 X2 6000+ | Core 2 Duo T7100 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+33%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($20) | ✅ More affordable ($15) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Athlon 64 X2 6000+ and Core 2 Duo T7100
Athlon 64 X2 6000+
The Athlon 64 X2 6000+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Windsor (2006−2007) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K. Built on 90 nm process technology. Socket: AM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,825 points. Launch price was $149.
Core 2 Duo T7100
The Core 2 Duo T7100 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 9 May 2007 (18 years ago). It is based on the Merom (2006−2008) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 1.8 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,817 points. Launch price was $197.
Processing Power
Both the Athlon 64 X2 6000+ and Core 2 Duo T7100 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.1 GHz on the Athlon 64 X2 6000+ versus 1.8 GHz on the Core 2 Duo T7100 — a 53.1% clock advantage for the Athlon 64 X2 6000+. The Athlon 64 X2 6000+ uses the Windsor (2006−2007) architecture (90 nm), while the Core 2 Duo T7100 uses Merom (2006−2008) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon 64 X2 6000+ scores 1,825 against the Core 2 Duo T7100's 1,817 — a 0.4% lead for the Athlon 64 X2 6000+. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.
| Feature | Athlon 64 X2 6000+ | Core 2 Duo T7100 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 3.1 GHz+72% | 1.8 GHz |
| Base Clock | — | 1.8 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 0 kB |
| L2 Cache | 512K | 2 MB+300% |
| Process | 90 nm | 65 nm-28% |
| Architecture | Windsor (2006−2007) | Merom (2006−2008) |
| PassMark | 1,825 | 1,817 |
Memory & Platform
The Athlon 64 X2 6000+ uses the AM2 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Core 2 Duo T7100 uses PGA478 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR2-800 memory speed. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Chipset compatibility: AMD AM2 (Athlon 64 X2 6000+) and GM965,PM965 (Core 2 Duo T7100).
| Feature | Athlon 64 X2 6000+ | Core 2 Duo T7100 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM2 | PGA478 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 1.1 | PCIe 1.1 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR2-800 | DDR2-667 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 16 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 0 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Athlon 64 X2 6000+) / VT-x (Core 2 Duo T7100). Primary use case: Core 2 Duo T7100 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Core 2 Duo T7100 rivals Athlon 64 X2 TK-42.
| Feature | Athlon 64 X2 6000+ | Core 2 Duo T7100 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | VT-x |
| Target Use | — | Budget |
Value Analysis
The Athlon 64 X2 6000+ launched at $450 MSRP, while the Core 2 Duo T7100 debuted at $197. At current prices ($20 vs $15), the Core 2 Duo T7100 is $5 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon 64 X2 6000+ delivers 91.3 pts/$ vs 121.1 pts/$ for the Core 2 Duo T7100 — making the Core 2 Duo T7100 the 28.1% better value option.
| Feature | Athlon 64 X2 6000+ | Core 2 Duo T7100 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $450 | $197-56% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $20 | $15-25% |
| Performance per Dollar | 91.3 | 121.1+33% |
| Release Date | 2007 | 2007 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Athlon 64 X2 6000+ and Core 2 Duo T7100
