Athlon II Neo K145 vs Ryzen 9 5900X

AMD

Athlon II Neo K145

1 Cores1 Thrd1 WWMax: 1.8 GHz2010
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Ryzen 9 5900X

12 Cores24 Thrd105 WWMax: 4.8 GHz2020
Ryzen family
·······

Athlon II Neo K145 vs Ryzen 9 5900X Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Athlon II Neo K145 vs Ryzen 9 5900X FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Athlon II Neo K145 vs Ryzen 9 5900X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Athlon II Neo K145

2010

Why buy it

  • Costs $499 less on MSRP ($50 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
  • Draws 1W instead of 105W, a 104W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 5900X across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Lower PassMark (565 vs 38,955).
  • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 11.3 vs 71.0 PassMark/$ ($50 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).

Ryzen 9 5900X

2020

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +1882.8% higher average FPS across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Delivers 527.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 71.0 vs 11.3 PassMark/$ ($549 MSRP vs $50 MSRP).
  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

  • 998% HIGHER MSRP
    $549 MSRPvs$50 MSRP
  • 10400% higher power demand at 105W vs 1W.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 9 5900X better than Athlon II Neo K145?
Yes. Ryzen 9 5900X is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 1882.8% average FPS lead across 49 shared CPU game tests in our data, 6794.7% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Ryzen 9 5900X is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 1882.8% more average FPS across 49 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 9 5900X is the stronger fit. You are getting 6794.7% better PassMark, backed by 12 cores and 24 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Ryzen 9 5900X is the better buy right now. Ryzen 9 5900X comes in 998.0% more expensive on MSRP at $549 MSRP versus $50 MSRP, and it still gives you a 1882.8% average FPS lead across 49 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 527.9% better value on MSRP (71.0 vs 11.3 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Ryzen 9 5900X makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2020 vs 2010) and more multi-core headroom with 12 cores / 24 threads instead of 1/1. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Athlon II Neo K145 vs Ryzen 9 5900X Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

Athlon II Neo K145

The Athlon II Neo K145 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Nile (2010) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1.8 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: S1. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 565 points. Launch price was $149.

AMD

Ryzen 9 5900X

The Ryzen 9 5900X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 November 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (Zen3) (2020−2022) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 38,955 points. Launch price was $549.

Processing Power

The Athlon II Neo K145 packs 1 cores / 1 threads, while the Ryzen 9 5900X offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the Ryzen 9 5900X has 11 more cores. Boost clocks reach 1.8 GHz on the Athlon II Neo K145 versus 4.8 GHz on the Ryzen 9 5900X — a 90.9% clock advantage for the Ryzen 9 5900X. The Athlon II Neo K145 uses the Nile (2010) architecture (45 nm), while the Ryzen 9 5900X uses Vermeer (Zen3) (2020−2022) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon II Neo K145 scores 565 against the Ryzen 9 5900X's 38,955 — a 194.3% lead for the Ryzen 9 5900X.

FeatureAthlon II Neo K145Ryzen 9 5900X
Cores / Threads
1 / 1
12 / 24+1100%
Boost Clock
1.8 GHz
4.8 GHz+167%
Base Clock
3.7 GHz
L3 Cache
64 MB
L2 Cache
1 MB
512K (per core)+51100%
Process
45 nm
7 nm, 12 nm-84%
Architecture
Nile (2010)
Vermeer (Zen3) (2020−2022)
PassMark
565
38,955+6795%
Cinebench R23 Multi
21,000
Geekbench 6 Single
2,174
Geekbench 6 Multi
11,888
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Athlon II Neo K145 uses the S1 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Ryzen 9 5900X uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1066 on the Athlon II Neo K145 versus DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 9 5900X — the Ryzen 9 5900X supports 200.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen 9 5900X supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 4 GB 3100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 0 (Athlon II Neo K145) vs 24 (Ryzen 9 5900X) — the Ryzen 9 5900X offers 24 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AMD ASB2 (Athlon II Neo K145) and A320,B350,X370,B450,X470,B550,X570 (Ryzen 9 5900X).

FeatureAthlon II Neo K145Ryzen 9 5900X
Socket
S1
AM4
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 4.0+100%
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1066
DDR4-3200+200%
Max RAM Capacity
4 GB
128 GB+3100%
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
No
Yes
PCIe Lanes
0
24
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Athlon II Neo K145) / AMD-V (Ryzen 9 5900X). Primary use case: Ryzen 9 5900X targets Workstation. Direct competitor: Ryzen 9 5900X rivals Core i9-12900K.

FeatureAthlon II Neo K145Ryzen 9 5900X
Integrated GPU
No
No
Unlocked
Yes
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
AMD-V
Target Use
Workstation
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Athlon II Neo K145 was priced at $50, while the Ryzen 9 5900X came in at $549. On launch pricing ($50 vs $549), Athlon II Neo K145 was $499 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon II Neo K145 delivers 11.3 pts/$ vs 71.0 pts/$ for the Ryzen 9 5900X — making the Ryzen 9 5900X the 145% better value option.

FeatureAthlon II Neo K145Ryzen 9 5900X
MSRP
$50-91%
$549
Performance per Dollar
11.3
71.0+528%
Release Date
2010
2020

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.