Athlon Neo X2 L335 vs Turion 64 X2 TL-52

Athlon Neo X2 L335 vs Turion 64 X2 TL-52 Performance Spectrum

Athlon Neo X2 L335

2 / 2

1,331

+0.5%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Turion 64 X2 TL-52

2 / 2

1,324

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Athlon Neo X2 L335 vs Turion 64 X2 TL-52 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Athlon Neo X2 L335 vs Turion 64 X2 TL-52: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Athlon Neo X2 L335

2009

Why buy it

✅+0.5% higher PassMark.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $80 MSRP, while Turion 64 X2 TL-52 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌51100% higher power demand at 512W vs 1W.

Turion 64 X2 TL-52

2006

Why buy it

✅Draws 1W instead of 512W, a 511W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,324 vs 1,331).

Quick Answers

So, is Athlon Neo X2 L335 better than Turion 64 X2 TL-52?

Yes. Athlon Neo X2 L335 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 0.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.5% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

For gaming, this matchup is basically a tie in the data we have.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Athlon Neo X2 L335 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.5% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Athlon Neo X2 L335 is the better buy right now. Athlon Neo X2 L335 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $80 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (16.6 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Athlon Neo X2 L335 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2009 vs 2006) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Athlon Neo X2 L335 vs Turion 64 X2 TL-52 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Athlon Neo X2 L335

The Athlon Neo X2 L335 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Congo (2009) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.6 GHz. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: ASB1. Thermal design power (TDP): 512 kB. Memory support: DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 1,331 points. Launch price was $149.

Turion 64 X2 TL-52

The Turion 64 X2 TL-52 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Trinidad (2006−2007) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.6 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 90 nm process technology. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 1,324 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Athlon Neo X2 L335 and Turion 64 X2 TL-52 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.6 GHz on the Athlon Neo X2 L335 versus 1.6 GHz on the Turion 64 X2 TL-52 — identical boost frequencies. The Athlon Neo X2 L335 uses the Congo (2009) architecture (65 nm), while the Turion 64 X2 TL-52 uses Trinidad (2006−2007) (90 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon Neo X2 L335 scores 1,331 against the Turion 64 X2 TL-52's 1,324 — a 0.5% lead for the Athlon Neo X2 L335.

Feature	Athlon Neo X2 L335	Turion 64 X2 TL-52
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 2
Boost Clock	1.6 GHz	1.6 GHz
L2 Cache	512 kB	1 MB+100%
Process	65 nm-28%	90 nm
Architecture	Congo (2009)	Trinidad (2006−2007)
PassMark	1,331	1,324