
Celeron 4205U

Ryzen 7 3700X
Celeron 4205U vs Ryzen 7 3700X Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Celeron 4205U vs Ryzen 7 3700X FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Celeron 4205U vs Ryzen 7 3700X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Celeron 4205U
2019Why buy it
- β Draws 15W instead of 65W, a 50W reduction.
- β Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 610, while Ryzen 7 3700X needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- βWorse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 3700X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- βLower PassMark (1,350 vs 22,430).
- βSmaller total L3 cache (2 MB vs 32 MB).
Ryzen 7 3700X
2019Why buy it
- β Better for gaming: +659.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- β +1500% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 2 MB).
- β 100% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 12) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- βLaunch MSRP is still $329 MSRP, while Celeron 4205U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- β333.3% higher power demand at 65W vs 15W.
- βNo integrated graphics, while Celeron 4205U can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 3700X better than Celeron 4205U?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Celeron 4205U vs Ryzen 7 3700X Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron 4205U
The Celeron 4205U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 23 January 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Whiskey Lake-U (2018β2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 1.8 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1528. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 1,350 points. Launch price was $107.


Ryzen 7 3700X
The Ryzen 7 3700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019β2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 22,430 points. Launch price was $329.
Processing Power
The Celeron 4205U packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Ryzen 7 3700X offers 8 cores / 16 threads β the Ryzen 7 3700X has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 1.8 GHz on the Celeron 4205U versus 4.4 GHz on the Ryzen 7 3700X β a 83.9% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 3700X (base: 1.8 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The Celeron 4205U uses the Whiskey Lake-U (2018β2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 7 3700X uses Matisse (Zen 2) (2019β2020) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron 4205U scores 1,350 against the Ryzen 7 3700X's 22,430 β a 177.3% lead for the Ryzen 7 3700X. L3 cache: 2 MB (total) on the Celeron 4205U vs 32 MB on the Ryzen 7 3700X.
| Feature | Celeron 4205U | Ryzen 7 3700X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 8 / 16+300% |
| Boost Clock | 1.8 GHz | 4.4 GHz+144% |
| Base Clock | 1.8 GHz | 3.6 GHz+100% |
| L3 Cache | 2 MB (total) | 32 MB+1500% |
| L2 Cache | 256 kB (per core) | 512K (per core)+100% |
| Process | 14 nm | 7 nm, 12 nm-50% |
| Architecture | Whiskey Lake-U (2018β2019) | Matisse (Zen 2) (2019β2020) |
| PassMark | 1,350 | 22,430+1561% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 347 | β |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 585 | β |
Memory & Platform
The Celeron 4205U uses the FCBGA1528 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 7 3700X uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) β making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2133 on the Celeron 4205U versus DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 7 3700X β the Ryzen 7 3700X supports 50% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen 7 3700X supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 64 GB β 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 12 (Celeron 4205U) vs 24 (Ryzen 7 3700X) β the Ryzen 7 3700X offers 12 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Whiskey Lake-U (Celeron 4205U) and AMD 500 series,AMD 400 series,AMD 300 series (Ryzen 7 3700X).
| Feature | Celeron 4205U | Ryzen 7 3700X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1528 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 4.0+33% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2133 | DDR4-3200+50% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 GB | 128 GB+100% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 12 | 24+100% |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Celeron 4205U) / not specified (Ryzen 7 3700X). The Celeron 4205U includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 610), while the Ryzen 7 3700X requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron 4205U targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron 4205U rivals Pentium Gold 4417U.
| Feature | Celeron 4205U | Ryzen 7 3700X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | UHD Graphics 610 | β |
| Unlocked | No | β |
| AVX-512 | No | β |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | β |
| Target Use | Budget | β |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













