Celeron 7305 vs Core i5-13400F

CPU

GPU

Celeron 7305

5 Cores5 Thrd15 WWMax: 1.1 GHz2022

Buy on Amazon

Core i5-13400F

10 Cores16 Thrd65 WWMax: 4.6 GHz2023

Buy on Amazon

Celeron 7305 vs Core i5-13400F Performance Spectrum

Celeron 7305

5 / 5

2,520

0.0%

25,029

+893.2%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron 7305 vs Core i5-13400F FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron 7305 vs Core i5-13400F: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron 7305

2022

Why buy it

✅Costs $68 less on MSRP ($128 MSRP vs $196 MSRP).
✅Draws 15W instead of 65W, a 50W reduction.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics for 12th Gen, while Core i5-13400F needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-13400F across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (1,422 vs 16,211).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 20 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 19.7 vs 127.7 PassMark/$ ($128 MSRP vs $196 MSRP).
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-13400F.

Core i5-13400F

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +258.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+150% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 8 MB).
✅Delivers 548.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 127.7 vs 19.7 PassMark/$ ($196 MSRP vs $128 MSRP).
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Celeron 7305.

Trade-offs

❌
53.1% HIGHER MSRP
$196 MSRPvs$128 MSRP
❌333.3% higher power demand at 65W vs 15W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron 7305 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-13400F better than Celeron 7305?

Yes. Core i5-13400F is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 258.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 1040% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, 893.2% higher PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i5-13400F is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 258.1% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-13400F is the stronger fit. You are getting 1040% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, backed by 10 cores and 16 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 150% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 8 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i5-13400F is the better buy right now. Core i5-13400F comes in 53.1% more expensive on MSRP at $196 MSRP versus $128 MSRP, and it still gives you a 258.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 548.6% better value on MSRP (127.7 vs 19.7 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i5-13400F makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2022), 150% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 8 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 10 cores / 16 threads instead of 5/5. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Celeron 7305 vs Core i5-13400F Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron 7305

The Celeron 7305 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Alder Lake-U (2022) architecture. It features 5 cores and 5 threads. Max frequency: 1.1 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1744. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200, LPDDR5-5200, LPDDR4x-4267. Passmark benchmark score: 2,520 points. Launch price was $69.

Core i5-13400F

The Core i5-13400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 25,029 points. Launch price was $196.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron 7305 packs 5 cores / 5 threads, while the Core i5-13400F offers 10 cores / 16 threads — the Core i5-13400F has 5 more cores. Boost clocks reach 1.1 GHz on the Celeron 7305 versus 4.6 GHz on the Core i5-13400F — a 122.8% clock advantage for the Core i5-13400F. The Celeron 7305 uses the Alder Lake-U (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Core i5-13400F uses Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron 7305 scores 2,520 against the Core i5-13400F's 25,029 — a 163.4% lead for the Core i5-13400F. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 1,422 vs 16,211 (167.7% advantage for the Core i5-13400F). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 641 vs 2,407, a 115.9% lead for the Core i5-13400F that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 1,598 vs 11,408 (150.9% advantage for the Core i5-13400F). L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Celeron 7305 vs 20 MB (total) on the Core i5-13400F.

Feature	Celeron 7305	Core i5-13400F
Cores / Threads	5 / 5	10 / 16+100%
Boost Clock	1.1 GHz	4.6 GHz+318%
Base Clock	—	2.5 GHz
L3 Cache	8 MB (total)	20 MB (total)+150%
L2 Cache	1.25 MB (per core)	1.25 MB (per core)
Process	Intel 7 nm	Intel 7 nm
Architecture	Alder Lake-U (2022)	Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)
PassMark	2,520	25,029+893%
Cinebench R23 Multi	1,422	16,211+1040%
Geekbench 6 Single	641	2,407+276%
Geekbench 6 Multi	1,598	11,408+614%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron 7305 uses the FCBGA1744 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Core i5-13400F uses LGA1700 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-4800 memory speed. The Core i5-13400F supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 64 GB — 200% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 20 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: Alder Lake-U (Celeron 7305) and H610,B660,H670,Z690,B760,H770,Z790 (Core i5-13400F).

Feature	Celeron 7305	Core i5-13400F
Socket	FCBGA1744	LGA1700
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0	PCIe 5.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-4800	DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200
Max RAM Capacity	64 GB	192 GB+200%
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	20	20

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. The Celeron 7305 includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics for 12th Gen), while the Core i5-13400F requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron 7305 targets Budget, Core i5-13400F targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Celeron 7305 rivals Ryzen 3 7320U; Core i5-13400F rivals Ryzen 5 7600.

Feature	Celeron 7305	Core i5-13400F
Integrated GPU	Yes	No
IGPU Model	UHD Graphics for 12th Gen	—
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	VT-x, VT-d
Target Use	Budget	Gaming

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Celeron 7305 was priced at $128, while the Core i5-13400F came in at $196. On launch pricing ($128 vs $196), Celeron 7305 was $68 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron 7305 delivers 19.7 pts/$ vs 127.7 pts/$ for the Core i5-13400F — making the Core i5-13400F the 146.6% better value option.

Feature	Celeron 7305	Core i5-13400F
MSRP	$128-35%	$196
Performance per Dollar	19.7	127.7+548%
Release Date	2022	2023

Search Celeron 7305 on Amazon

Search Core i5-13400F on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.