PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron 7305 vs Core i5-2390T FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron 7305 vs Core i5-2390T: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron 7305

2022

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +4.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+166.7% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 3 MB).
✅Costs $54 less on MSRP ($128 MSRP vs $182 MSRP).
✅Delivers 43.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 19.7 vs 13.7 PassMark/$ ($128 MSRP vs $182 MSRP).
✅Draws 15W instead of 35W, a 20W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-2390T.

Core i5-2390T

2011

Why buy it

✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Celeron 7305.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Celeron 7305 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (2,491 vs 2,520).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (3 MB vs 8 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 13.7 vs 19.7 PassMark/$ ($182 MSRP vs $128 MSRP).
❌133.3% higher power demand at 35W vs 15W.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron 7305 better than Core i5-2390T?

Yes. Celeron 7305 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 4.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 1.2% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Celeron 7305 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 4.4% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron 7305 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.2% better PassMark, backed by 5 cores and 5 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 166.7% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 3 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron 7305 is the better buy right now. Celeron 7305 comes in $54 cheaper on MSRP at $128 MSRP versus $182 MSRP, and it still gives you a 4.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 43.8% better value on MSRP (19.7 vs 13.7 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron 7305 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2022 vs 2011), a healthier platform with FCBGA1744 and DDR5 instead of LGA1155, 166.7% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 3 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 5 cores / 5 threads instead of 2/4. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Celeron 7305 vs Core i5-2390T Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron 7305

The Celeron 7305 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Alder Lake-U (2022) architecture. It features 5 cores and 5 threads. Max frequency: 1.1 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1744. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200, LPDDR5-5200, LPDDR4x-4267. Passmark benchmark score: 2,520 points. Launch price was $69.

Core i5-2390T

The Core i5-2390T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 February 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,491 points. Launch price was $100.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron 7305 packs 5 cores / 5 threads, while the Core i5-2390T offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the Celeron 7305 has 3 more cores. Boost clocks reach 1.1 GHz on the Celeron 7305 versus 3.5 GHz on the Core i5-2390T — a 104.3% clock advantage for the Core i5-2390T. The Celeron 7305 uses the Alder Lake-U (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Core i5-2390T uses Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron 7305 scores 2,520 against the Core i5-2390T's 2,491 — a 1.2% lead for the Celeron 7305. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 641 vs 614, a 4.3% lead for the Celeron 7305 that directly translates to higher frame rates. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Celeron 7305 vs 3 MB (total) on the Core i5-2390T.

Feature	Celeron 7305	Core i5-2390T
Cores / Threads	5 / 5+150%	2 / 4
Boost Clock	1.1 GHz	3.5 GHz+218%
Base Clock	—	2.7 GHz
L3 Cache	8 MB (total)+167%	3 MB (total)
L2 Cache	1.25 MB (per core)+400%	256 kB (per core)
Process	Intel 7 nm-78%	32 nm
Architecture	Alder Lake-U (2022)	Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
PassMark	2,520+1%	2,491
Cinebench R23 Multi	1,422	—
Geekbench 6 Single	641+4%	614
Geekbench 6 Multi	1,598	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron 7305 uses the FCBGA1744 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Core i5-2390T uses LGA1155 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-4800 on the Celeron 7305 versus DDR3-1333 on the Core i5-2390T — the Celeron 7305 supports 260.1% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron 7305 supports up to 64 GB of RAM compared to 32 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 20 (Celeron 7305) vs 16 (Core i5-2390T) — the Celeron 7305 offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Alder Lake-U (Celeron 7305) and H61,H67,P67,Z68,B75,Z77 (Core i5-2390T).

Feature	Celeron 7305	Core i5-2390T
Socket	FCBGA1744	LGA1155
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+150%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-4800+260%	DDR3-1333
Max RAM Capacity	64 GB+100%	32 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	20+25%	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Celeron 7305) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-2390T). Both include integrated graphics — UHD Graphics for 12th Gen (Celeron 7305) and HD Graphics 2000 (Core i5-2390T) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron 7305 targets Budget, Core i5-2390T targets Legacy Low Power Desktop. Direct competitor: Celeron 7305 rivals Ryzen 3 7320U; Core i5-2390T rivals A8-3800.

Feature	Celeron 7305	Core i5-2390T
Integrated GPU	Yes	Yes
IGPU Model	UHD Graphics for 12th Gen	HD Graphics 2000
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use	Budget	Legacy Low Power Desktop

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Celeron 7305 was priced at $128, while the Core i5-2390T came in at $182. On launch pricing ($128 vs $182), Celeron 7305 was $54 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron 7305 delivers 19.7 pts/$ vs 13.7 pts/$ for the Core i5-2390T — making the Celeron 7305 the 36% better value option.

Feature	Celeron 7305	Core i5-2390T
MSRP	$128-30%	$182
Performance per Dollar	19.7+44%	13.7
Release Date	2022	2011

Search Celeron 7305 on Amazon

Search Core i5-2390T on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.