
Celeron 7305

Core i7-9700K
Celeron 7305 vs Core i7-9700K Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Celeron 7305 vs Core i7-9700K FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Celeron 7305 vs Core i7-9700K: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Celeron 7305
2022Why buy it
- β Costs $257 less on MSRP ($128 MSRP vs $385 MSRP).
- β Draws 15W instead of 95W, a 80W reduction.
- β Newer platform on FCBGA1744 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1151 and DDR4.
- β 25% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- βWorse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-9700K across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- βLower PassMark (2,520 vs 14,397).
- βSmaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 12 MB).
- βLower PassMark per dollar, at 19.7 vs 37.4 PassMark/$ ($128 MSRP vs $385 MSRP).
Core i7-9700K
2018Why buy it
- β Better for gaming: +290.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- β +50% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 8 MB).
- β Delivers 89.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 37.4 vs 19.7 PassMark/$ ($385 MSRP vs $128 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- β200.8% HIGHER MSRP$385 MSRPvs$128 MSRP
- β533.3% higher power demand at 95W vs 15W.
- βOlder platform position on LGA1151 with DDR4, while Celeron 7305 moves to FCBGA1744 and DDR5.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i7-9700K better than Celeron 7305?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Celeron 7305 vs Core i7-9700K Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron 7305
The Celeron 7305 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Alder Lake-U (2022) architecture. It features 5 cores and 5 threads. Max frequency: 1.1 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1744. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200, LPDDR5-5200, LPDDR4x-4267. Passmark benchmark score: 2,520 points. Launch price was $69.

Core i7-9700K
The Core i7-9700K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 19 October 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake-R (2018β2019) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 14,397 points. Launch price was $374.
Processing Power
The Celeron 7305 packs 5 cores / 5 threads, while the Core i7-9700K offers 8 cores / 8 threads β the Core i7-9700K has 3 more cores. Boost clocks reach 1.1 GHz on the Celeron 7305 versus 4.9 GHz on the Core i7-9700K β a 126.7% clock advantage for the Core i7-9700K. The Celeron 7305 uses the Alder Lake-U (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Core i7-9700K uses Coffee Lake-R (2018β2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron 7305 scores 2,520 against the Core i7-9700K's 14,397 β a 140.4% lead for the Core i7-9700K. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Celeron 7305 vs 12 MB (total) on the Core i7-9700K.
| Feature | Celeron 7305 | Core i7-9700K |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 5 / 5 | 8 / 8+60% |
| Boost Clock | 1.1 GHz | 4.9 GHz+345% |
| Base Clock | β | 3.6 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 8 MB (total) | 12 MB (total)+50% |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core) | 256K (per core)+20380% |
| Process | Intel 7 nm-50% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Alder Lake-U (2022) | Coffee Lake-R (2018β2019) |
| PassMark | 2,520 | 14,397+471% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 1,422 | β |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 641 | β |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 1,598 | β |
Memory & Platform
The Celeron 7305 uses the FCBGA1744 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Core i7-9700K uses LGA1151 (PCIe 3.0) β making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-4800 on the Celeron 7305 versus DDR4-2666 on the Core i7-9700K β the Celeron 7305 supports 80% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i7-9700K supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 64 GB β 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 20 (Celeron 7305) vs 16 (Core i7-9700K) β the Celeron 7305 offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Alder Lake-U (Celeron 7305) and Intel 300 series (Core i7-9700K).
| Feature | Celeron 7305 | Core i7-9700K |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1744 | LGA1151 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+67% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-4800+80% | DDR4-2666 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 GB | 128 GB+100% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 20+25% | 16 |
Advanced Features
Only the Core i7-9700K has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking β a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. Both include integrated graphics β UHD Graphics for 12th Gen (Celeron 7305) and UHD Graphics 630 (Core i7-9700K) β useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron 7305 targets Budget, Core i7-9700K targets Desktop. Direct competitor: Celeron 7305 rivals Ryzen 3 7320U.
| Feature | Celeron 7305 | Core i7-9700K |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | UHD Graphics for 12th Gen | UHD Graphics 630 |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | Budget | Desktop |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Celeron 7305 was priced at $128, while the Core i7-9700K came in at $385. On launch pricing ($128 vs $385), Celeron 7305 was $257 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron 7305 delivers 19.7 pts/$ vs 37.4 pts/$ for the Core i7-9700K β making the Core i7-9700K the 62% better value option.
| Feature | Celeron 7305 | Core i7-9700K |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $128-67% | $385 |
| Performance per Dollar | 19.7 | 37.4+90% |
| Release Date | 2022 | 2018 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














